Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
#2 PPP uses a less accurate method and it has shown.
#3 It is possibly true, but this thing ebbs and flows - don't be so fickle to ignore this when it says Santorum, or Romney.
#4 Ron Paul supporters in the past claimed that they are apart of the conspiracy when PPP shows Paul with low numbers head to head with Republicans then now you will scream for joy how accurate they are when they have a good Ron Paul poll.
The corruption of the established status quo, has been well documented, but never reported.
Wait, PPP had Ron Paul earning roughly the correct amount of votes that he got on election day in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.
So is PPP part of the anti-Ron Paul conspiracy?!?!?! Or are their polls accurate like the one at the top of this thread? You Tin Foil hat wearers can't have it both ways?
So the PPP poll showing Ron Paul doing better against Obama than Santorum or Romeny would is accurate?!?!
While the current PPP poll showing Ron Paul with only 15% in Michigan is a fraud and part of a conspiracy?!?! Also PPP is currently polling that Ron Paul is only at 13% for Republicans nationwide...that must be a PPP conspiracy too?!?!? But if their poll is favorable to Ron Paul it is spot on accurate?!?!?!
""Ron Paul performs the best of the Republicans against Obama among independents on almost every poll we do.""
That is where general elections are won and lost.... Unless you have corruption at the polls.
So when a PPP poll says something unfavorable for Ron Paul like that Ron Paul would lose Nevada and not even make it close...they are part of a conspiracy as Ron Paul secretly got more votes and it was stolen away from him.
Yet when PPP polls something favorable for Ron Paul, you jump for joy for how accurate their work is and the great things it means for Ron Paul?
PPP polls are fairly new, or they are just now getting the exposure.
Ron Paul performs the best of the Republicans against Obama among independents on almost every poll we do.
Then they must have not polled very many independents. or everyone is lying that independents make or break an election.
I was commenting on the comment, more than polling numbers.
True or False...if a poll says something good about Ron Paul it is used as proof of Ron Paul's viability.
True or False...if a poll says something bad about Ron Paul or confirms that Ron Paul didn't win Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, etc it is used as proof of a conspiracy to hurt Ron Paul.
P.S. The current PPP Poll has Ron Paul 4th amongst Republican candidates.
True or False...if a poll says something good about Ron Paul it is used as proof of Ron Paul's viability.
True or False...if a poll says something bad about Ron Paul or confirms that Ron Paul didn't win Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, etc it is used as proof of a conspiracy to hurt Ron Paul.
P.S. The current PPP Poll has Ron Paul 4th amongst Republican candidates.
Truth is, after so much documentation of the polling being manipulated and changed, I personally don't put much weight into the bandwagon game, being played in the media.
It does seem weird or just planned, the official outcomes are much different than the results that were coming out of the caucus chairmen & chairwomen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
