Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It hugely matters which one wins, if the race it 'tween the two, ultimately. Obama is a Communist subversive that is determined to "fundamentally transform" our nation into an obedient bunch of world servants.
Romney is a true American and opposite BO on many, if not most things. Only problem is, are we really controlled by a shadow, world govt, already? and therefore can Romney "rage against the machine" and not be done like JFK, if he wins?
It was never going to be anyone but Romney. Finally it appears Republicans realize Romney's flip-flopping is something they can work with... he is merely a figurehead willing to conform to all Conservative ideals.
The Palin, Bachman, Cain, and Perry follies were just feel-good mini eras of stress relief. Gingrich would be the candidate but not with that personal life.
That's why even with all the whackos on display, I've been bored with the whole runup. Now if ya'll can get the economy to plunge, he might have half a chance.
Pretty much. They are alot more similar than different. What would Romney do different than Obama?
Offhand, I cannot think of anything. I think an "agenda" is in place well before a President is elected or reelected, and all Presidents are expected to follow it. It doesn't matter if it's Dem or a Repub in the WH.
the only difference I see between Obama and Romney is that Romney wouldn't push for expanding governments role in health care, such a mandates, etc.. Or maybe he would???????
the only difference I see between Obama and Romney is that Romney wouldn't push for expanding governments role in health care, such a mandates, etc.. Or maybe he would???????
Partistan hacks will tell you that it's different, because government involvement on a state level is great, but government involvement on a national level is communism.
lol... if the Iowa caucasus aren't enough to get you to see how quickly things chance in politics then nothing will. November is a long way away, I am sure there will be a lot of ups and downs
lol... if the Iowa caucasus aren't enough to get you to see how quickly things chance in politics then nothing will. November is a long way away, I am sure there will be a lot of ups and downs
I have come to the conclusion that our whole election process has been poisoned. Our nation is probably past the point of no return. As for Paul, the "people in charge" won't allow him to win.
If by "the people in charge" you mean the vast majority of sane, decent Americans who vote in primary and general elections, then I agree. There's no way in hell those people will allow Ron Paul to win.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
