Romney foot-in-mouth disease: "I'm not concerned with the very poor"

[Cinebar]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days-in-Florida

I wish people would learn how to comprehend his words.

Either left wing nuts cannot comprehend or they are trying to lie themselves into believing this man said this when we all know he did not.

He said people who are poor have safety nets in place. I see people like Larry Odonnell leaves this part out and his little spineless followers run with it.

Mitt has given many poor people jobs, has Obama given a poor person a job so they can earn a living? No. He gives them welfare instead.

Next failure from the left.

Yes, and he also said that almost $400,000 was "not much," that he's "unemployed," he likes to fire people, and he knows what it's like to think he might get a pink slip. Oh, and he tries to make a $10,000 bet on the debate stage.

And then, of course. there are those bank accounts in other countries, his reluctance to release to release any tax returns, and then his refusal to release more than two years.

Face it, most of all Americans know this man can create jobs, he has done it.

Well, this American knows no such thing. Can you provide some credible sites to prove that he has created more jobs than he's destroyed?

Most Americans know Obama does not care for the poor at all based on the facts of his horrific record of putting more people on welfare and into poverty.

You know, you really should stop speaking for "most Americans." LOL

Again, what is your proof that President Obama "does not care for the poor at all?" It looks like, from the recent job report, that people are starting to go back to work, after the raping this country took at the hands of the previous administration.

And, of course, no republi-thugs are happy about the good news because they are more concerned with politics than they are that maybe people are going to be able to take care of themselves and their families by getting back to work - no longer needing the assistance that so many on the right begrudge them.

And as far as President Obama "putting more people on welfare," is that the "safety net" that Mittens was referring to? You know, the reason he doesn't have to be concerned about poor people - because they are "taken care of?" Apparently Mittens has no problem with people living in poverty (because that is what living on welfare is - poverty) and getting their welfare/safety nets.

[slo1318]

Originally Posted by Cinebar

Yes, and he also said that almost $400,000 was "not much," that he's "unemployed," he likes to fire people, and he knows what it's like to think he might get a pink slip. Oh, and he tries to make a $10,000 bet on the debate stage.

And then, of course. there are those bank accounts in other countries, his reluctance to release to release any tax returns, and then his refusal to release more than two years.

Well, this American knows no such thing. Can you provide some credible sites to prove that he has created more jobs than he's destroyed?

You know, you really should stop speaking for "most Americans." LOL

Again, what is your proof that President Obama "does not care for the poor at all?" It looks like, from the recent job report, that people are starting to go back to work, after the raping this country took at the hands of the previous administration.

And, of course, no republi-thugs are happy about the good news because they are more concerned with politics than they are that maybe people are going to be able to take care of themselves and their families by getting back to work - no longer needing the assistance that so many on the right begrudge them.

And as far as President Obama "putting more people on welfare," is that the "safety net" that Mittens was referring to? You know, the reason he doesn't have to be concerned about poor people - because they are "taken care of?" Apparently Mittens has no problem with people living in poverty (because that is what living on welfare is - poverty) and getting their welfare/safety nets.

Wow, Ive never seen someone so badly base their "knowledge" of someone off of headlines. Obama has indeed presided over the largest increase of welfare recipients ever, thats not an opinion.
Romney wants welfare to be what it is intended for. A temporary safety net for the down and out, not a lifestyle choice.