Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2012, 08:57 AM
 
Location: NC
1,956 posts, read 1,818,865 times
Reputation: 898

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
What Ron Paul supporters want in Nevada and are fine with on a moral level, is for the rights of the 9% (the Ron Paul voters) to have the majority say.

All while talking about having the real values of Government that none of the other candidates have.

In Ron Paul World 9% > Romney's 51%
The delegate strategy is well-documented, and well-known amongst all GOP candidates. This is no secret voodoo magic going on here. The so-called caucus straw poll is just that, a straw poll (similar to the straw polls which regularly happened before the elections too). If it was meant to select the delegates directly, you bet that would have been the party rules. The conventions are held to select the delegates to make sure that only the committed and informed people get to have a say in the nomination process. It's been this way for DECADES - this didn't happen out of the blue just in '08 or '12.

If we just wanted a majority opinion, we should scrap the whole electoral college voting system, and do a nationwide popular vote. Do you prefer that? You won't. Why? Because no Republican will ever be president if that's the case. The caucus conventions are a microcosm of the electoral college process.

Besides, why can't other candidates follow the same delegate strategy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2012, 09:25 AM
 
26,716 posts, read 15,265,392 times
Reputation: 14835
Quote:
Originally Posted by moving_pains View Post
The delegate strategy is well-documented, and well-known amongst all GOP candidates. This is no secret voodoo magic going on here. The so-called caucus straw poll is just that, a straw poll (similar to the straw polls which regularly happened before the elections too). If it was meant to select the delegates directly, you bet that would have been the party rules. The conventions are held to select the delegates to make sure that only the committed and informed people get to have a say in the nomination process. It's been this way for DECADES - this didn't happen out of the blue just in '08 or '12.

If we just wanted a majority opinion, we should scrap the whole electoral college voting system, and do a nationwide popular vote. Do you prefer that? You won't. Why? Because no Republican will ever be president if that's the case. The caucus conventions are a microcosm of the electoral college process.

Besides, why can't other candidates follow the same delegate strategy?
Ron Paul supporters need to drop the crap that they stand for higher values if they think it is fair that a guy who gets 9% of the vote gets most of the delegates. It is hypocritical.

The system is highly flawed and needs to be changed when a guy who finishes 4th out of 4 can get most of the delegates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 09:32 AM
 
Location: NC
1,956 posts, read 1,818,865 times
Reputation: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Ron Paul supporters need to drop the crap that they stand for higher values if they think it is fair that a guy who gets 9% of the vote gets most of the delegates. It is hypocritical.

The system is highly flawed and needs to be changed when a guy who finishes 4th out of 4 can get most of the delegates.
Nice deflection, but let me try it again.

Why can't other candidates follow the same delegate strategy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: NC
4,100 posts, read 4,533,299 times
Reputation: 1372
And it's only... just... begun...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,770 posts, read 105,198,488 times
Reputation: 49251
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
Seems like you know even less about a brokered convention. Delegates won't matter if it gets there, and your also ran isn't on their radar. Jindel, Christie, Jeb, but your guy, pleaze.
Brokered or contested convention will not help Paul a bit, you are right. It will go to a candidate that isn't in the running right now, like you say. I think some need to understand more and pay better attention to the process. Certainly if the number 1 guy doesn't get the nomination it would be number 2, like almost happened in 1976. The 3rd and 4th would stand no chance.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,685 posts, read 6,771,801 times
Reputation: 6598
Just a sign of things to come. Common sense can only be ignored for so long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,218,249 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by MelancholyBeast View Post
It looks like the possibility of no one getting enough delegates unless somebody drops out... I think the GOP wants a brokered convention... In which case Ron Paul will have final say and will name Rand Paul the nominee...
Oh pleaze, Paul's support is 10%, plus or minus, now and will be the same during the convention. If people were loving him they'd be voting for him.

If it ain't mittens, it will be Christie or someone else (not pain). I think Christie because they keep fat boy rested this way...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 03:11 PM
 
26,716 posts, read 15,265,392 times
Reputation: 14835
Quote:
Originally Posted by moving_pains View Post
Nice deflection, but let me try it again.

Why can't other candidates follow the same delegate strategy?
They can and they now are.

That doesn't change the fact that the system is highly flawed AND that Ron Paul supporters have forfeited the higher ground that they claimed they owend. You can't claim moral superiority if the premise of your campaign is to subvert the will of the people (4th out of 4 in the popular vote).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 03:18 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,021,676 times
Reputation: 2358
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
They can and they now are.

That doesn't change the fact that the system is highly flawed AND that Ron Paul supporters have forfeited the higher ground that they claimed they owend. You can't claim moral superiority if the premise of your campaign is to subvert the will of the people (4th out of 4 in the popular vote).
Exactly how is using the existing system to your best advantage (while violating no laws, policies, or established methodologies) equivalent with "forfeiting the higher ground"?

The will of the people is in no way bound to the will of either Republicans or Democrats. Both parties would have to significantly improve to work their way up to the level of bad.

As an aside, bold red type does nothing to strengthen your claims. It does however do a fine job of illustrating your desperation while highlighting your inability to utilize the spell check feature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2012, 04:42 PM
 
26,716 posts, read 15,265,392 times
Reputation: 14835
Quote:
Originally Posted by outbacknv View Post
Exactly how is using the existing system to your best advantage (while violating no laws, policies, or established methodologies) equivalent with "forfeiting the higher ground"?

The will of the people is in no way bound to the will of either Republicans or Democrats. Both parties would have to significantly improve to work their way up to the level of bad.

As an aside, bold red type does nothing to strengthen your claims. It does however do a fine job of illustrating your desperation while highlighting your inability to utilize the spell check feature.
I made it red, because he did.

Explain, how Ron Paul's strategy is not to subvert the will of the voters by having 4th place get the most delegates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top