
04-30-2012, 02:29 PM
|
|
|
13,596 posts, read 18,817,532 times
Reputation: 7289
|
|
A CNN public opinion poll was taken in recent days.
Public opinion, obviously sent "the names that the average American recognizes" to the top of the list. The average American has never heard of Rob Portman so he was well down the list.
The #1 choice among those polled, for GOP V.P. nominee for Romney, was Condoleezza Rice.
Supposed he did choose her.
(a prediction site gives her, as of today, a 3% chance of being chosen by Romney)
And suppose Romney could not serve out his term.
In 2016 you could have Rice vs. Hillary Clinton (one of the Democratic favorites for 2016).
No it won't happen, but it could.
|

04-30-2012, 03:03 PM
|
|
|
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,786 posts, read 98,908,399 times
Reputation: 49141
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard555
A CNN public opinion poll was taken in recent days.
Public opinion, obviously sent "the names that the average American recognizes" to the top of the list. The average American has never heard of Rob Portman so he was well down the list.
The #1 choice among those polled, for GOP V.P. nominee for Romney, was Condoleezza Rice.
Supposed he did choose her.
(a prediction site gives her, as of today, a 3% chance of being chosen by Romney)
And suppose Romney could not serve out his term.
In 2016 you could have Rice vs. Hillary Clinton (one of the Democratic favorites for 2016).
No it won't happen, but it could.
|
This has got to be one of the most moot point postings I have ever seen. Rice has no intentions of doing anything in politics again, and it is unlikely Hillary will either, so what difference does this make? So a prediction site gives her a 3% chance, that means there is a 97% chance he will not ask her. BTW name recognition when running for VP means nothing.
nita
|

04-30-2012, 03:19 PM
|
|
|
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 16,579,167 times
Reputation: 7987
|
|
I think the odds of Hillary 2016 are even lower than Romney-Rice 2012. According to Game Change she was exhausted and frazzled by the 2008 campaign and really did not want to take the SOS job when Obama offered it. If she ran and won in 2016 she would be almost 70 upon taking office.
|

05-01-2012, 04:11 PM
|
|
|
Location: Tennessee
37,097 posts, read 38,705,368 times
Reputation: 59337
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard555
A CNN public opinion poll was taken in recent days.
Public opinion, obviously sent "the names that the average American recognizes" to the top of the list. The average American has never heard of Rob Portman so he was well down the list.
The #1 choice among those polled, for GOP V.P. nominee for Romney, was Condoleezza Rice.
Supposed he did choose her.
(a prediction site gives her, as of today, a 3% chance of being chosen by Romney)
And suppose Romney could not serve out his term.
In 2016 you could have Rice vs. Hillary Clinton (one of the Democratic favorites for 2016).
No it won't happen, but it could.
|
If Hillary Clinton is the Democrat nominee, she's just as radical as Obama. She's no Bill Clinton.
|

05-01-2012, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
4,120 posts, read 6,235,062 times
Reputation: 2283
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC
If Hillary Clinton is the Democrat nominee, she's just as radical as Obama. She's no Bill Clinton.
|
Awesome, hopefully she runs 
|

05-01-2012, 05:20 PM
|
|
|
1,083 posts, read 2,165,415 times
Reputation: 922
|
|
Rice won't do s@@t for Romney, nevermind running on her own in the future.
I'm looking for some Liberty in my future. Rand Paul 2016!
|

05-01-2012, 05:21 PM
|
|
|
1,083 posts, read 2,165,415 times
Reputation: 922
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellhead
Awesome, hopefully she runs 
|
But she's never been called a n****r.
|

05-01-2012, 07:01 PM
|
|
|
288 posts, read 202,141 times
Reputation: 147
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCOriolesfan
Rice won't do s@@t for Romney, nevermind running on her own in the future.
I'm looking for some Liberty in my future. Rand Paul 2016!
|
keep dreaming....
|

05-01-2012, 07:04 PM
|
|
|
288 posts, read 202,141 times
Reputation: 147
|
|
[quote=nmnita;24096924]This has got to be one of the most moot point postings I have ever seen. Rice has no intentions of doing anything in politics again, and it is unlikely Hillary will either, so what difference does this make? So a prediction site gives her a 3% chance, that means there is a 97% chance he will not ask her. BTW name recognition when running for VP means nothing.
the way i see it, hillary is setting herself up for 2016, if she runs she will will by a landslide.....
|

05-02-2012, 12:31 PM
|
|
|
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,499 posts, read 25,744,607 times
Reputation: 8943
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard555
A CNN public opinion poll was taken in recent days.
Public opinion, obviously sent "the names that the average American recognizes" to the top of the list. The average American has never heard of Rob Portman so he was well down the list.
The #1 choice among those polled, for GOP V.P. nominee for Romney, was Condoleezza Rice.
Supposed he did choose her.
(a prediction site gives her, as of today, a 3% chance of being chosen by Romney)
And suppose Romney could not serve out his term.
In 2016 you could have Rice vs. Hillary Clinton (one of the Democratic favorites for 2016).
No it won't happen, but it could.
|
The public recognizes Donald Trump and Paris Hiltons name as well.
Its irrelevant. Which is of course, is why CNN is talking about it. Disinformation rules the MSM.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|