Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So they want to cut SS and go to a voucher system for medicare, while people like my family pay out the stinking nose (way more than most people earn in a year) in income taxes while people like Romney pay less than 1%?
Where in Gods green earth are you getting the idea Romney pays only 1%? You know I would like to see both sides of the stroy and I would love to have enough income to pay more in taxes, but when I see statements like, "he pays less than 1% I can't even keep an open mind about the other side.
Typical nonsense HeyJude, YOU kooks are making the argument he paid 0.. YOU kooks, need to validate that as accurate or you're a liar..
Unless of course you are now going to admit Obama is a child molester because you cant prove otherwise..
Nonsense, is claiming something is true, without anything to back it up.. but here ya are..
Silly, silly pgh. Romney has provided no proof that he paid a dime in taxes before 2010. That's not a lie, that is the absolute truth. You know it, I know it, everyone on this board knows it. No amount of nonsense on your part can refute the fact that Romney has provided not a shred of evidence he paid any income taxes whatsoever before 2010, and in fact, he continues to refuse to provide a shred of evidence to that effect. Obfuscate away, that still remains the fact.
Are you doubting if the rich pay now the largest share of the taxes and are you doubting this will continue? If the rich pay only 20% of their income for example, they will pay a heck of a lot more than a person in the lower or middle class will pay and they will not reap all the same benefits.
I would be more than happy if the rich paid 20%. Obama wants 30% of capital gains and I think that is excessive (at that level it really would discourage investment). But the Romney/Ryan plan is 0% and that is just plain wrong when middle income people are paying the percentages they are and the country is struggling with the deficits it is.
Silly, silly pgh. Romney has provided no proof that he paid a dime in taxes before 2009.
And? The fact that he hasnt provided proof doesnt mean you can say whatever the hell you wish and lie
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514
That's not a lie, that is the absolute truth. You know it, I know it, everyone on this board knows it. No amount of nonsense on your part can refute the fact that Romney has provided not a shred of evidence he paid any income taxes whatsoever before 2010, and in fact, he continues to refuse to provide a shred of evidence to that effect. Obfuscate away, that still remains the fact.
Ahh, seen now you're moving the goal post so you dont appear to be supporting stupidity.
Saying he hasnt showed proof that he's paid a dime, isnt the same as saying he hasnt paid a dime, which is what you were supporting just 2 minutes ago.
Why the need to move the goal post? Because you are upset at finding out Obama is a child molester until he proves otherwise according to standards you set
Romney insists that the rich will still pay the largest share of the taxes........but won't comment on what percentage of their income they would pay..........kind of a dodge, if you will.
Conservatives and right-wingers don't give a crap out debt and deficits. It's all ideology. They just want to privatize everything and eliminate taxes.
And? The fact that he hasnt provided proof doesnt mean you can say he has,
Ahh, seen now you're moving the goal post so you dont appear to be supporting stupidity.
Saying he hasnt showed proof that he's paid a dime, isnt the same as saying he hasnt paid a dime, which is what you were supporting just 2 minutes ago.
Why the need to move the goal post? Because you are upset at finding out Obama is a child molester until he proves otherwise according to standards you set
Do you know what moving the goal post means? Because I'm not sure that you do. Everyone has stated that FOR ALL WE KNOW, Romney hasn't paid any taxes. The point is Romney is not giving any of us any proof of anything. That's MUCH different from your Obama example, because that is criminal conduct, and we'd sure hear all about it if Obama had a criminal record LOL.
Silly, silly pgh. Romney has provided no proof that he paid a dime in taxes before 2010. That's not a lie, that is the absolute truth. You know it, I know it, everyone on this board knows it. No amount of nonsense on your part can refute the fact that Romney has provided not a shred of evidence he paid any income taxes whatsoever before 2010, and in fact, he continues to refuse to provide a shred of evidence to that effect. Obfuscate away, that still remains the fact.
And Obama has provided no proof that he is not a child molester. He has not provided a shred of evidence prove his innocence. See, 2 can play the silly game.
But maybe we can use a "real life" situation. Obama has provided no proof that he knew nothing about Fast and Furious. In fact, he blocked any attempt to have the proof released. Hmmmm, I think he MUST be hiding something.
Do you know what moving the goal post means? Because I'm not sure that you do. Everyone has stated that FOR ALL WE KNOW, Romney hasn't paid any taxes.
Lie
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52
That would be an increase over that decade of 0.00%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa
Well, it is progress. It is .82% more than he paid for most of the past 10 years.
Point out where "for all we know" was used?
Hey, for all I know, Obama is a child molester. Maybe he should release his criminal records to prove he's never been caught..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
