Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What sour grapes. Clinton is a superstar, but many speeches at the DNC brought the house down. Romney said that he did not watch Obama's speech, only read the transcript. I'm smelling a lie somewhere Willard. Why would you watch Clinton's speech, but not your opponent's? And if you did not even watch Obama's, when did you put time aside to watch the other speeches? You know, everytime I just start to feel sorry for Romney's total lack of "je ne sais quoi", he shows how totally void of integrity he is and I genuinely dislike him.
Last edited by sickofnyc; 09-08-2012 at 08:10 PM..
You know, they said Obama's speech sucked, to a certain degree that maybe so.
However, willard is going to suffer much much grater from just sour grapes when he squares unto the POTUS.
Clinton & Co was used to fire the base paving the way for Obama in the main event.
I'm thinking Obama diliberately gave just about enough for people from both sides of the isle to think it was played "Safe".
But that will all change come deliberation night where the President will be firing on all cylinders and give willard an unrellenting amount of shellaking to seal the deal with undecided voters.
You always save your best for the ultimate and more satisfying battles, nothing is going to save willards a$$ from a good beating and so is why he's been practising with a mock up Obama, One thing i notice about the Dems is they approach things with a strategy and plan for every eventuallity for this main election.
What sour grapes. Clinton is a superstar, but many speeches at the DNC brought the house down. Romney said that he did not watch Obama's speech, only read the transcript. I'm smelling a lie somewhere Willard. Why would you watch Clinton's speech, but not your opponent's? And if you did not even watch Obama's, when did you put time aside to watch the other speeches? You know, everytime I just start to feel sorry for Romney's total lack of "je ne sais quoi", he shows how totally void of integrity he is and I genuinely dislike him.
Gee, Clinton's speeches didn't help Hillary in 2008 did they? Anyone paying attention knows what Clinton said in that speech is not what he really believes. His ideas on the economy are 180 degrees different from Obama's. Clinton just doesn't want Hillary to have to run against a successful President Romney in 2016.
Gee, Clinton's speeches didn't help Hillary in 2008 did they? Anyone paying attention knows what Clinton said in that speech is not what he really believes. His ideas on the economy are 180 degrees different from Obama's. Clinton just doesn't want Hillary to have to run against a successful President Romney in 2016.
Well, that first statemernt kind of shows that Obama and his campaign strategy should not be underestimated if he beat the Clinton machine.
How are Obama's ideas on the economy different from Clinton's?
If Willard is successful it will only benefit the top 1%, in other words...Romney and his donors or should I say OWNERS. His policies are Bush's failed policies...nuff said!
Last edited by sickofnyc; 09-08-2012 at 11:36 PM..
That's because Clinton is praising Romney. You noticed Clinton did not slam Romney in his address. That shows he thinks Romney will win and he or Hillary want to work with him in the future on some program. It's the writing on the wall. Romney will win.
This has got to be amusing for Clinton. The Republicans demonized him and Hillary. They impeached him. They wasted millions and millions of dollars investigating any woman who ever met him and every check Hillary ever wrote.
Revenge is a dish best eaten cold and he sure looks like he's building up an appetite.
Well, that first statemernt kind of shows that Obama and his campaign strategy should not be underestimated if he beat the Clinton machine.
How are Obama's ideas on the economy different from Clinton's?
If Willard is successful it will only benefit the top 1%, in other words...Romney and his donors or should I say OWNERS. His policies are Bush's failed policies...nuff said!
That just is not true but we all know Obama's policies are Obama's failed policies of the last 4 years. Can we afford 4 more? Most will say NO.
This has got to be amusing for Clinton. The Republicans demonized him and Hillary. They impeached him. They wasted millions and millions of dollars investigating any woman who ever met him and every check Hillary ever wrote.
Revenge is a dish best eaten cold and he sure looks like he's building up an appetite.
Clinton is a pragmatist. He knows Romney will win and he won't trash him. Obama trashed the Clintons in the last election. Doesn't matter, Clinton will always go with the winner and so he is gong with Romney since he knows he is winning,.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
