Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, the entire manipulation of the American Presidency is more of a nightmare, than a dream. Why don't you Google Goldman Sachs + BRIC. Notice there is no U.S.A. in BRIC.
Romney will pick up a few points now that he supports select parts of Obamacare.
Even though his campaign made a statement afterwards that he really doesn't support them, no matter what he said on Meet the Press--was he just saying what he thought David Gregory wanted to hear?
My favorite comment coming out of his campaign is that "the market" will take care of the problem with gaining health insurance if you have a preexisting condition--I mean, that worked SO WELL in the past...
I know some keep pushing the Jimmy Carter thing vs. Reagan because of the recession, but a big factor for Reagan was that he was charismatic, and Carter was not. Who's going to win the personality/likeability competition in this race? That's where I think the analogy is flawed.
Maybe one of the "little people" who work on Mittie's campaign should tell him that the healthcare system in the US bears no relation to a free market. There are cartels, price breaks for certain groups, etc. I guess he wouldn't know that since he doesn't have to bother his little head about details like that.
Looking at those numbers, I personally don't see anything that screams "Obama will win!" Conversely, I see a tied race that screams nothing other than it being a tied race.
Margin of Error. Embrace it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.