***Presidential Debate #2 Tuesday 10/16/12*** (unemployed, 9/11, Putin, Iraq)

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by Tilt11

I hate the town hall format. If you are undecided this late in the game, and so uninformed to have to ask some of the questions that were asked, you really shouldnt vote. If you arent going to do your own homework and wait until 3 weeks before hand to pay attention, then for God's sake, stay home and dont vote. Go back to your celebrity gossip or whatever it else you spend your time doing.

The askers likely know more than the typical voter in either party who votes party, regardless of who.

[cremebrulee]

Originally Posted by maseman

yeah, keep trying to split hairs and say that "acts of terror" isn't just another way of saying "terrorism." keep pushing that line, neo-cons.

i'm not a neocon, i'm an independent, and i know what i heard on tv...and the news....

[MantaRay]

Originally Posted by cremebrulee

yes, he did, he was speaking about 911, not Benghazi....

FALSE. See above post with the actual excerpt of the speech and discussion of the excerpt. To say he was not speaking about Benghazi is to totally deny reality and to be part of the attempt to perpetuate the Romney lie when people who can actually read English can see from the speech that President Obama WAS talking about Benghazi.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by LauraC

How come all of the people asking questions had to read them? Aren't those supposedly their questions?

How savvy would you be if you were standing before two powerhouses? It's not a conspiracy.

[MaseMan]

Originally Posted by cremebrulee

i'm not a neocon, i'm an independent, and i know what i heard on tv...and the news....

Well, if you know what you saw and heard, then why keep trying to split hairs with grammar semantics?

[MantaRay]

Originally Posted by cremebrulee

No where does he state that it was a TERRORIST Attack,

To those who understand English, act of terror = terrorist attack. To suggest otherwise is to engage in some weird bizarro-anti-logic.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by TempusFugitive

MSNBC swaying ROMNEY? Aside from the inexplicably delusional, I would say nobody saw that coming.

Why not? Romney clearly beat Obama on many of the issues that matter most to voters... the economy, taxes, the deficit, and health care.

If you saw that coming, I would suggest you are probably psychic.

Psychic? No, I just watched the debate like all those others who saw Romney beat Obama on the important issues.

[MaseMan]

Originally Posted by MantaRay

To those who understand English, act of terror = terrorist attack. To suggest otherwise is to engage in some weird bizarro-anti-logic.

Most of the Republicans have been living in Bizarro Land for the past four years, trying to fight some imagined up Bizarro version of Barack Obama.

[KrazeeKrewe]

It was wrong for the moderator Candice to inject her misleading terror fact-check into the debate. Obama never said the Benghazi killing was an act of terror in his rose garden address.

I watched the debate on CNN & their timers showed Obama talked 5 minutes longer than Romney. Every time Romney tried to get equal time to make his point the moderator Candice would shut him down. She was defiantly trying to make Romney look bad. Romney had to be assertive & step on her toes because she would have shut him out & let Obama do all the talking.

[Ponderosa]

Biden schools Ryan and Obama makes mincemeat of Romney - all in less than a week!