Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:56 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
1,991 posts, read 3,972,796 times
Reputation: 917

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Nobody is denying he used those words.
Good, then since those words = terrorist attack, and since his sentences immediately before those words were about the subject of Benghazi, and the sentences immediately after those words were also about the subject of Benghazi, and the sentence IN WHICH those words appeared didn't create any NEW subject besides Benghazi to discuss, then the sentence IN WHICH those words appeared was ALSO about the subject of Benghazi. Basic logic. Thus Republicans are trying to deny basic logic so as to score some political points when people died, same as Mitt Romney's reckless first words after the attack tried to do. Those first words got condemned by Republicans for trying to score the political points and having the facts wrong. But now Republicans have jumped on the scoring political points badwagon and having the facts wrong right along with Mitt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
The issue is he did not call Benghazi a terrorist attack
Of course he did. See above for the basic logic of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:58 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,044,307 times
Reputation: 3603
Candy interrupted Romney 28 times, Obama 9 times. Obama was also given 9 % more time to speak. On top of that, she went outside her moderator role and on Libya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,093 posts, read 51,289,449 times
Reputation: 28337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Candy interrupted Romney 28 times, Obama 9 times. Obama was also given 9 % more time to speak. On top of that, she went outside her moderator role and on Libya.
Romney refused to follow the rules just like in the first debate. He got away with it then, but Crowley held his feet to the fire this time. Good for her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:59 AM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,301,883 times
Reputation: 3580
Default Romney channels his inner Hugh Hefner, "I've got binders full of women"

Gaffe or is this what he views women?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc...amio1_1280.jpg



Romney: "I've Got Binders Full of Women" - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:00 AM
 
2,986 posts, read 4,581,165 times
Reputation: 1664
"Government does not create jobs. Government does not create jobs."

"I'm going to create 12 million new jobs"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:01 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,333,713 times
Reputation: 8958
Default I meant Romney, of course!

Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Once again, Obama rambled and stumbled his way past questions, often not with the slightest hint of an answer.

He had noting to offer. Ryan was the clear winner.
Just noticed my mistake. Obviously, I meant Romney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:01 AM
 
Location: CA
74 posts, read 199,161 times
Reputation: 44
Hahahahahahaha!

Dj, those are hilarious! Clinton is my fav too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:05 AM
 
Location: South East
4,209 posts, read 3,593,600 times
Reputation: 1465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoozoocracker13 View Post
Mitt Romney is an IDIOT and he OFFENDED women across America tonight once again.
This dude is crazy and he is just another opportunist who was trying to bully our president tonight.
He was disrespected to women tonight, he was disrespected to our President and he was disrespected to all of us ordinary Americans.
Stop trying to make women look stupid! We are not....or at least some of us are not.

Women know this election is about the economy and jobs and making sure our families can support themselves. Also, it is about leaving a future for our children. Every women with half a brain knows that Obama is destructive to our country and our families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:07 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,148,098 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by MantaRay View Post
Good, then since those words = terrorist attack, and since his sentences immediately before those words were about the subject of Benghazi, and the sentences immediately after those words were also about the subject of Benghazi, and the sentence IN WHICH those words appeared didn't create any NEW subject besides Benghazi to discuss, then the sentence IN WHICH those words appeared was ALSO about the subject of Benghazi. Basic logic. Thus Republicans are trying to deny basic logic so as to score some political points when people died, same as Mitt Romney's reckless first words after the attack tried to do. Those first words got condemned by Republicans for trying to score the political points and having the facts wrong. But now Republicans have jumped on the scoring political points badwagon and having the facts wrong right along with Mitt.



Of course he did. See above for the basic logic of it.
Dear Liberals,

Do you not understand that the emphasis being put on the semantics of what was/is/wasn't an "act of terror" is just another scheme to turn your attention away from the overarching issue that the United States of America FAILED it's foreign ambassadors in hostile territory?

Why waste your energy on something trivial when you could be holding your government accountable?

Get your head out of your ass.

Thanks,

Johnny "See Through The Smoke Screen" Citizen
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:07 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,044,307 times
Reputation: 3603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Romney refused to follow the rules just like in the first debate. He got away with it then, but Crowley held his feet to the fire this time. Good for her.
28 times!!!!!!!!!!!!! So what are the rules? Give Obama 9% more time? Please, Obama had more time and still couldnt come out ahead on the key issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top