Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Honestly, it's just hilarious at this point that the neo-cons are trying to make some huge issue out of the Benghazi incident. Yes, it was a tragedy, but in the grand scheme of things the events and the followups on it mean very little to the American people at large.
Honestly, it's just hilarious at this point that the neo-cons are trying to make some huge issue out of the Benghazi incident. Yes, it was a tragedy, but in the grand scheme of things the events and the followups on it mean very little to the American people at large. Romney looked petty trying to exploit it the day after, and he looked petty trying to exploit it last night.
I think to the average voter you are right. Same with his hauling out F&F on the question of assault weapons. But the debate was more about appealing to the base and the right wing media has whipped the faithful into a frenzy over these things. So while they are a non-issue for the vast majority of America, they ring true with the hard core supporters that Romney is trying to get to the polls.
WH Press Secretary Jay Carney STILL insisting on September 19th, more than 1 week after the attack, that it wasn't pre-planned or premeditated. Note the WH Press Corps's astonished response at the ongoing Obama Admin LIES about Libya...
WH Press Secretary Jay Carney STILL insisting on September 19th, more than 1 week after the attack, that it wasn't pre-planned or premeditated. Note the WH Press Corps's astonished response at the ongoing Obama Admin LIES about Libya...
1. Entitlement - majority of Obama's supporters
2. Hold a grudge - hate conservatives because most of us are members of the 1%
3. Take all the credit of their victories - like the Bin Laden
4. Blame Others for their failures - it is all Bush fault - typical argument especially liberals on this forum
5. Criticize - see above
6. Exude anger - just read the liberals posting on this forum
Of course not, Romney loves being rich, I am sure he would love to be even richer, heck, I am sure he would take money from employees to make himself richer.....oh wait, he already did that.
Sorry, but I hope this isn't an issue that you are basing your vote on, because
you might as surely as I type become successful in America. You will be asked
to give the fruits of "your" labor to the federal government to spend on "whatever".
This isn't an issue of the have and have not(s) anymore. It's an issue of
accountability and representation:
If I were you, I would begrudge "Anyone" who simply wants to tax your hard
earned work; I don't care if it's from a minimum wage job or CEO.
If the candidate isn't for getting rid of the Individual Raping of Persons (IRS)
I'd find a candidate that "really" represents your best interest...
IMO, that would be third party (Johnson) Libertarian.
The other two candidates - just smoke and mirrors.
He did. I'm not providing one of the hundreds of links that confirm that The POTUS in fact called it "an act of terror" the very next day in The Rose Garden, although I have on many posts. Find them yourself.
i think thats up for debate no matter how many links you provided.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
