Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah, Mittens had momentum there for a little bit but that's all but evaporated. Romney's a loser but at least he can go back to his house with the car elevator.
I expect him to be back in 2016. After all, he will still be younger than McCain was in '08 (I think).
Or maybe he will pass the professional candidate torch to Tag. And then Willard can serve his country (like he failed to do during the Viet Nam War) by working on his son's campaign.
Ya better wake and smell the coffee buddy boy. Just look at PA. Obamas numbers are going down and Romney's are moving up. States that you lefties assumed were in the bag for your boy are now becoming questionable.
Really?
You must be colorblind. Looks like a "sea of blue" to me there.
I know you are scared, but you DO have to face the truth.
Even MICHIGAN is now close!! 49% O and 46% R. WIthin the margin of error. Really? That is a shock and you know it. A month ago, O had a 14 point lead. Again, wake up!
Romney has gained there - but it's still a "sea of blue".
Change to prosperity and full employment. Stop the shutdown of industry and utilities based on the massive EPA expansion. Stop the insane, unsustainable deficit levels. Find leaders who will lead on the debt and deficit and unsustainable entitlements. Fix financial reform so it doesn't strangle our community banks.
All of these things will be easier if we start in 2013 instead of 2017.
Change to prosperity and full employment. Stop the shutdown of industry and utilities based on the massive EPA expansion. Stop the insane, unsustainable deficit levels. Find leaders who will lead on the debt and deficit and unsustainable entitlements. Fix financial reform so it doesn't strangle our community banks.
All of these things will be easier if we start in 2013 instead of 2017.
I agree with you that Congress went overboard with financial regulations. I think a little more risk is a good thing. Then again, we don't really know what the full regulatory impact will be as the regulations aren't completely baked yet. The rest of your post is just shop worn, tired, and inaccurate republican talking points.
I agree with you that Congress went overboard with financial regulations. I think a little more risk is a good thing. Then again, we don't really know what the full regulatory impact will be as the regulations aren't completely baked yet. The rest of your post is just shop worn, tired, and inaccurate republican talking points.
Oh, we already know that Obama's financial regulation is hammering our community banks out of existence, although it will take a few years. Most of the remaining unknowns in the regs have to do with how large a fraction of the regs get totally subverted by the "too big to fail" institutions, the clear winners in all of this. Ironic, isn't it? Dodd Frank is pro-plutocrat to the max. And the President claims anyone who peeps about it is "trying to go back to the failed policies that got us into this mess." Puhleeeeze!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
POLL (POTUS FL, OH, VA- Oct. 31): Obama 48% Romney 47% (FL), Obama 50% Romney 45% (OH), Obama 49% Romney 47% (VA)
