Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So what should the revenue increase be? Of course you have no clue. Because you have no expertise in analyzing their revenue projections. You believe you do Which makes you even more naive than I first thought.
You are the one who is insisting on being naive. Why are you even asking that question when it has already been answered - the answer is 28.82% for 2012 plus all the other inflated numbers, even though our GDP won't exceed 2-2.5% next year and there is certainly NO 4-5% growth in wages occurring in the US anytime soon.
You are the one who is insisting on being naive. Why are you even asking that question when it has already been answered - the answer is 28.82% for 2012 plus all the other inflated numbers, even though our GDP won't exceed 2-2.5% next year and there is certainly NO 4-5% growth in wages occurring in the US anytime soon.
No. The answer is the the SS trustee report is correct.
Experts would be ALL OVER THIS HUGE ERROR if you were correct.
Romney will get the jobs back. When the jobs come back people can stay in their homes.
Only when magic pigs fly from his butt. Mitt has no idea whatsoever about the struggles of the working folks.
If you liked Bush, you're gonna love Romney.
the last 5 polls all have Obama over 50 and Romney isnt doing anything in the state.
I don't think anyone realistically expected Romney to win Nevada. Obama has given Nevada and California the highest unemployment rates in the nation and they must love to be unemployed.
I don't think anyone realistically expected Romney to win Nevada. Obama has given Nevada and California the highest unemployment rates in the nation and they must love to be unemployed.
I did. Nevada is a strange fig - It's high Mormon presence shows a strong potential for a good turnout for Mitt Romney, while its high Latino vote bats for Obama in general.
However: The Latino vote is rarely as active as the Mormon vote, and the older folks generally go for Republicans and they have much higher turnout than the younger people who tend to vote Democrat. As I've said for months, this election will come down to voter turnout: High voter turnout means Obama wins. Low voter turnout means Romney wins.
I still tentatively stand by Mitt Romney taking Nevada due to voter turnout, though since Obama is setting up shop there today, he may be able to energize his base.
The CBS & PPP polls are truly ridiculous. Dem+8 in both. That means they think Dem TO will EXCEED 2008 and republican TO will be below the mark...even after multiple polls show wide enthusiasm gap for GOP.
That's not what that means. If there are more Dems in a sample, that's simply a function of fewer people self-identifying as Republican. The polls capture Dem, Repub and Independents, so it's not like there's this hidden bloc of voters that's just waiting to push Romney up to 58% in the polls.
That's not what that means. If there are more Dems in a sample, that's simply a function of fewer people self-identifying as Republican. The polls capture Dem, Repub and Independents, so it's not like there's this hidden bloc of voters that's just waiting to push Romney up to 58% in the polls.
Well, there is the imaginary voters, kind of the the imaginary Romney positions. Don't count them out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.