Doing the math: Obama recovery still the worst in decades (vote, Congress)

[jt800]

Lately, Barack Obama has taken to claiming that he’s leading a slow but steady economic recovery, hampered by the nature of the 2007-8 Great Recession and other external factors.

Two different analyses out today rebut that assertion on the eve of the next advanced report on quarterly GDP:

First, Investors Business Daily’s John Merline refutes both the economic recovery and the supposedly mitigating context in its analysis, buttressed by a charted comparison to previous American recoveries.

Second, Reason Foundation’s Samuel Staley writes at Real Clear Markets that not only has Obamanomics utterly failed, it’s gone a long way to discrediting the very economic assumptions on which it was based.

[jt800]

When faced with rebutting actual statistics, math, and facts.......Liberals are strangely silent???

[Scotty011]

Originally Posted by jt800

When faced with rebutting actual statistics, math, and facts.......Liberals are strangely silent???

They never could deal with facts. They try to change the subject or just stare like a deer caught in the headlights.

[Hadoken]

And the financial collapse is still the worst since the Great Depression. The actual question is, why should we vote for the political party that actively opposed all efforts to get the economy back on track, rather than the democrats?

[petch751]

Ahh the liberal lame blame game... Blame Bush, blame congress, blame congress, blame the weather, blame the movie.

Remember, Obama has already spent more money than anyone else in the history of the world. And he isn’t anywhere near done yet. By the time he gets through pushing his socialist agenda through the Congress, all U.S. Citizens will be living below the poverty line and the only entity that will have any money at all will be the government. Now, how he figures that this will create jobs and fix the economy is anyone’s guess.