Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Socialist International is the worldwide organisation of social democratic, socialist and labour parties. It currently brings together 170 political parties and organisations from all continents...including the United States
Board of Directors
Madeleine K. Albright, Chairman
Rachelle Horowitz, Vice Chair
Marc B. Nathanson, Vice Chair
Kenneth F. Melley, Secretary
Eugene Eidenberg, Treasurer
Kenneth D. Wollack, President
Albright now heads this organization which is listed as an associated party by the Socialist International. Other member parties of the Socialist International in the USA include Democratic Socialists of America, and Social Democrats USA. It's very interesting that such a high profile person in American politics is leading a socialist oriented group. The Socialist International is an alliance of Social Democrat, Socialist, and Labor parties from all over the world. The British Labour Party and the Social Democrats of Sweden are among its members...as well as the Sandinistas.
And now you know why she doesnt like Romney
Last edited by turbo700; 10-30-2012 at 12:24 PM..
Reason: clean it up
I think most objective observers of the campaign discussions, speeches and debates have come away from those events with the clear message that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are woefully unprepared to step into the offices they're running for ... when it comes to two crucial/important responsibilities: Foreign Policy and National Security:
You are not sure because you are about as clueless as the rest of them, on the subject, still assuming "experience" as a pre-requisite for the office and value it more than you do of the person's undertanding and approach.
Really!
I seem to recall, four years ago, when the left could not stop hyperventilating over the fact that Palin's "only experience" was as a Governor.
Obama understanding? OF WHAT!? How to vote, "Present"?
I seem to recall, four years ago, when the left could not stop hyperventilating over the fact that Palin's "only experience" was as a Governor.
Obama understanding? OF WHAT!? How to vote, "Present"?
I try not to speak for others. To me it wasn't lack of experience in Palin that was an issue. Instead, you should tell me, what were you preaching back then about experience? Do you value experience? Or, do you appreciate the approach REGARDLESS of the experience? Or, do you flip-flop based on circumstances?
I try not to speak for others. To me it wasn't lack of experience in Palin that was an issue. Instead, you should tell me, what were you preaching back then about experience? Do you value experience? Or, do you appreciate the approach REGARDLESS of the experience? Or, do you flip-flop based on circumstances?
I don't flip flop. Obama sucks. I've never strayed from that position.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
