Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2012, 04:25 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,479,529 times
Reputation: 5752

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Nice response...just what I had hoped for. So far no one disputes that Mitt Romney won 77.7 pct of counties, or more than 3 out of 4.
And so far you have yet to demonstrate why anyone should care about that little factoid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2012, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,437,516 times
Reputation: 6288
Unless mountains, cactus and barley are suddenly given votes, the GOP will have to file this little statistic under "moral victories".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,392,513 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
And so far you have yet to demonstrate why anyone should care about that little factoid.
Nor will I try to demonstrate it. Again, it's just a stat; feel free to intepret it as you wish. Just an interesting stat, very much like the popular vote. I don't see so much 'lady protesteth' when people report the popular vote results. hmmmm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 04:48 PM
 
47,020 posts, read 26,093,286 times
Reputation: 29507
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Nice response...just what I had hoped for. So far no one disputes that Mitt Romney won 77.7 pct of counties, or more than 3 out of 4.
Consider it undisputed. Also, nobody disputes that on this date in 1642, Abel Tasman discovered New Zealand - a fact equally relevant in the context of the 2012 Presidential election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,102,794 times
Reputation: 2312
The OP didn't even bother to break out a red and blue land area map.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 05:03 PM
 
518 posts, read 407,677 times
Reputation: 215
Butt hurt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,437,516 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Nor will I try to demonstrate it. Again, it's just a stat; feel free to intepret it as you wish. Just an interesting stat, very much like the popular vote. I don't see so much 'lady protesteth' when people report the popular vote results. hmmmm.
Land area (counties) vs popular vote (registered voters)

Totally the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 05:06 PM
 
518 posts, read 407,677 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
So far no one disputes that Mitt Romney won 77.7 pct of counties, or more than 3 out of 4.
When the president is chosen by counties and not state-appointed electors, you can congratulate yourself. Until then, this is about as relevant as discussing who won the Ralph Lauren apparel wearing voting bloc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 05:08 PM
Sco
 
4,259 posts, read 4,926,689 times
Reputation: 3373
I am not saying that it is, but even if the county percentage was an interesting topic for discussion the OP has completely ignored the fact that in the counties that Romney won, he didn't get 100% of the vote. So, even if counties meant something, the OP has chosen to disregard the possibility that Romney might have only received a slim majority of the vote of any specific county.

So, we are really talking about Romney winning 77% of the counties by an unspecificed percentage of the vote. That means that an undetermined number of people in those same 77% of the counties did not vote for Romney. I guess it would be fair to say that Romney received at least 50.1% of the vote of 77% of the counties in the US that when combined do not amount to more than a tiny percentage of all votes cast in the election.

Add it all up and Romney still lost big time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,282 posts, read 19,276,757 times
Reputation: 14922
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
In responding to the question about the electoral college, I threw in the factoid that W Bush won 2439 counties vs. 674 for Al Gore. Then it occurred to me that I never had seen anywhere what pct. of counties were won by Romney and Obama. I only find one source that bothered to do the calculation:
Obama-Romney: The County Count « spreadsheetjournalism

(btw the blogger (I don't see his/her name listed) offers some interesting further analysis).

The blogger comes up with 2259 counties for Romney, 649 for Obama, a 77.7 rout for Romney. Note that there are apparently discrepancies in the way that counties are counted. If you add the totals from Bush-Gore, you get 3113, while Romney Obama comes to 2908. According to wikipedia there are certain cities that are not part of a county, so considered as 'county equivalents.' Also according to wikipedia, the US Census counts 3033 counties and county-equivalents in the US. Anyway close enough for government work.

If anyone has a different source for the number of counties won by Romney & Obama, please post it. Interesting that this particular number was pretty widely commented on in 2000, but ignored in 2012.
There's always that pesky problem of having to win counties that actually have people living in them that's hard to overcome...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top