Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2007, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,574,845 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

LOS ANGELES — I’ve got a great idea.

Let’s pile on Hillary.

Let’s jump all over her, claim she stumbled horribly at the debate, that her chances of winning have taken a huge hit, that she’s whining like a girl about it.

FOXNews.com - Hillary Under Attack For Being a Winner, Not for Being a Woman - Opinion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2007, 05:03 AM
 
2,970 posts, read 2,257,497 times
Reputation: 658
A tad premature. She hasn't won anything yet. She may be the front runner but why? Because she was married to a former disgraced president. Think about it; would anyone even know who she was if she hadn't been Bill's wife?

How does being a former 1st lady give her any credence? Yes, I know she is now a Senator but I still say she road coattails all the way. I mean why would NY even elect her? She wasn't from NY, had no history there, and moved there with one goal in mind. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2007, 05:04 AM
 
384 posts, read 1,132,145 times
Reputation: 197
Hillary is a loser and a crook, not a damned winner. I'd be jumping all over her too, the last thing our country needs is another uber-corrupted politician in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2007, 05:10 AM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,165,460 times
Reputation: 3346
Quote:
Originally Posted by spunky1 View Post
I mean why would NY even elect her? She wasn't from NY, had no history there, and moved there with one goal in mind. . .
What's really amazing is this: After they originally elected her, THEY RE-ELECTED HER!!!! INCREDIBLE!!! WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2007, 05:15 AM
 
2,970 posts, read 2,257,497 times
Reputation: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50 View Post
What's really amazing is this: After they originally elected her, THEY RE-ELECTED HER!!!! INCREDIBLE!!! WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS??!!
Simple: name recognition, and the masses are "star-struck." Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2007, 07:53 AM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,633,867 times
Reputation: 2397
Thankfully, in a presidential race, the candidates still do have to "perform". And Hillary has not yet really had to. So maybe she is in shock that she is being asked to make her views plain now, thus the whining. Could be the heat will be too much for her and she will get out of the kitchen! It's not as if she belongs there anyway....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2007, 09:48 PM
 
Location: OKC, OK
640 posts, read 461,212 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by jak88 View Post
Hillary is a loser and a crook, not a damned winner.
Not to mention she's got a "6" behind each ear....

This article was written by Susan Estrich ~ take it with a grain of salt...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2007, 09:50 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,844,914 times
Reputation: 9283
LOL... look where it is coming from... FOX news?? They want to grab your attention by making controversial claims to get better ratings... they are the "Jerry Springer" of news networks, their stories are complete bunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2007, 09:19 AM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,625,985 times
Reputation: 3028
I agree with the idea that the ONLY reason she is able to run and be in the front is because she is a former first lady. Kind of like Guiliani is only able to be a front runner because 9/11 happened in New York City. Had the terrorist attacked Los Angeles instead, everyone would be saying: Rudy who???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2007, 09:56 AM
 
Location: SanAnFortWAbiHoustoDalCentral, Texas
791 posts, read 2,222,256 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
LOS ANGELES — I’ve got a great idea.

Let’s pile on Hillary.

Let’s jump all over her, claim she stumbled horribly at the debate, that her chances of winning have taken a huge hit, that she’s whining like a girl about it.
Cool ! ! !

I agree with Susan Estrich (okay, I'll gag in hell for that)

Great link and quote... Thanks for the heads up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top