Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Could Herman Cain won the nomination if he had a serious platform?
Yes 4 20.00%
No 16 80.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:03 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,653,986 times
Reputation: 7571

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryBTL View Post
After reading a few of your posts i have come to the conclusion you have some serious issues. FYI.. It is known by a number of people ( especially on the inside ) that the ole dirty Chicago political machine is what did Cain in. The left feared him because ala taking away black dem votes. Funny how once Cain dropped out all of his so called accusers vanished into the night again.

Cain was going good till his original campaign manager left for a better job offer. That happened in early October. Thus right before the 999 crap showed it's ugly head. Cain had been a long supporter of the fair tax vs that so called flat tax. Those like me ( who worked for his campaign ) is why 999 became 909 ( the 0 meaning no taxes for the working poor ) but i had left by that point as i did not care for where it started to go. The new Campaign manager changed the whole theme. Many dont know but the final reason Cain dropped out was because he got a number of death threats to him and his family.

Had Cain been able to keep his original campaign manager and thus stuck to the original plan i am pretty sure he could have won. Keep in mind he did not talk like a hawk neoconservative either and thus see the stupid comments about the border fence etc that came later. He was all for cutting defense spending, Regulations ( this did not change ), open to civil unions etc and thus more of a moderate on some social issues.
Why would his accusers remain in the spotlight after he dropped out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Battle Creek, MI
494 posts, read 804,938 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
Why would his accusers remain in the spotlight after he dropped out?
Does this really need answering? Is the obvious not that obvious? Sorry for how i am coming across but not sure what else to say to such a question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top