Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2015, 02:23 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,487,117 times
Reputation: 3563

Advertisements

Well, she may push forward while republicans are still busy discrediting Obama. Here is one example out of many:

https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...see-obama.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2015, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Utah
546 posts, read 411,000 times
Reputation: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
My wife would love to vote for a female for president. It won't be Hillary. She says anyone that would allow their husband to treat them like Bill treats Hillary is someone she could never vote for.
I would have had a lot more respect for her if she had left Bill in the wake of the blue dress scandal. I realize not everyone leaves a cheating spouse, but not everyone is humiliated in the public eye by it either.
I saw her as more interested in staying married for prestige and power, not love. This wasn't improved by what I viewed as carpet bagging to run for Senate in New York.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Alaska
7,554 posts, read 5,806,330 times
Reputation: 4953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellwood View Post
Here is a woman who doesn’t shop, doesn’t cook, has not driven a car since 1995, tolerates a husband who cheats, has a foul mouth, treats secret service agents like slaves, got fired from a law firm for lying, involved in the mysterious circumstances of the death of Vince Foster, involved in questionable stock trades, failed at the healthcare reform assigned by her husband, spent 4 years as Sec of State without a single positive result, in fact left a legacy of foreign affairs that in 2 years has become potentially WWIII, is still embroiled in the Benghazi scandal with the death of 4 Americans, and now serious questions about her handling of US Government communications and probably could not pass the background check to get a Top Secret Security Clearance.
But she and others think she can relate to all Americans and be the next President.
REALLY!?
Obama had zero qualifications and is in office because he's black. It's not hard for me to believe certain voters will support Hillary because she a woman regardless of her horrible record.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 04:09 PM
 
16,218 posts, read 7,180,984 times
Reputation: 8686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
How is Hillary going to keep the Republicans out of the WH when she IS one. lol.
hmm. why do you say that? because she is connected to wall street as much as any republican? that she's a hawk manipulable by the Israeli lobby?
i don't love her as much as i did the last time around. but she is the only winnable dem. right now. it would be a bad day for america to see any of the current women- hating, science-denying war-mongering poor-hating republican men become president of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,720,767 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
hmm. why do you say that? because she is connected to wall street as much as any republican? that she's a hawk manipulable by the Israeli lobby?
i don't love her as much as i did the last time around. but she is the only winnable dem. right now. it would be a bad day for america to see any of the current women- hating, science-denying war-mongering poor-hating republican men become president of this country.
But there are other Dems considering running.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 05:19 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,449,191 times
Reputation: 18436
President Obama's policies have been a resounding success, which is why this country is flourishing now rather than PERISHING as we typically do under a Republican president. She's smart to continue those policies, while tweaking them as she sees fit. She's a tough, smart, experienced politician, with exceptional judgment and instincts (which is why she is a Dem). She merely needs to emphasize this and point out the atrocious record of the GOP, not only in Congress, but in all they do.

Her strategy is a simple one, compared to that of the GOP. The GOP must do everything, and say anything, to sucker in votes and support, since their base does not have the nation's best interests in mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 05:44 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,025,227 times
Reputation: 7315
Her strategy will be run the table on the Blue Wall, which is as formidable a Electoral vote base as the UConn women's basketball team.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2015, 06:01 PM
 
16,218 posts, read 7,180,984 times
Reputation: 8686
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But there are other Dems considering running.
Who among them have a better chance of winning than Clinton?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,904,639 times
Reputation: 35592
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Good luck to her. I am glad she is taking this path and hope she will try to win Warren to her side and campaign for her. I would have been happier to see Warren run but Hillary has the big bucks. This will be a good compromise.
Anything that will keep the party of the motely crew from taking over the government of this country.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/12/us...etType=nyt_now

Lol, she sure does have the "big bucks"--from the 1% she's been railing against while she campaigns to limit the First Amendment under the guise of campaign finance reform: Maggie Williams, Johnny Chung, George Soros, Charlie Tree,...Buddhist monks () gooood, beaucoups bucks from any contributor to Republicans baaad.

Wake up, sheeple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,993,910 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Too many people think it's the President that "does things".

It's really Congress that "does things".
And "doesn't do things" as with the current Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top