Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-03-2015, 11:06 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,967,844 times
Reputation: 6059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Oh, I would, too. But we'd still have a significant disparity between those who pay and those who take. As funding even a limited government that doesn't reach beyond its Constitutional limits requires tax revenue, everyone should pay the same tax rate.

Example: 10% flat tax.

$30,000 earner pays $3,000
$3,000,000 earner pays $300,000

$300,000 is still significantly more than $3,000.
Yes, lets make a poor, elderly widow pay the same rate as the billionaire. How about we start taxing capital gains at Scandinavian rates of 28-42%. That's where the 0.1% get their money.

Its hilarious to see you pretend like you actually would benefit from the policies you promote. You are not some big shot millionaire and you will never be one. They laugh at people like you who tirelessly carry their water like a bootlicker. You are part of the bewildered rabble they despise.

Last edited by PCALMike; 10-03-2015 at 11:27 PM..

 
Old 10-04-2015, 12:43 AM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,980,377 times
Reputation: 20003
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Yes, lets make a poor, elderly widow pay the same rate as the billionaire. How about we start taxing capital gains at Scandinavian rates of 28-42%. That's where the 0.1% get their money.

Its hilarious to see you pretend like you actually would benefit from the policies you promote. You are not some big shot millionaire and you will never be one. They laugh at people like you who tirelessly carry their water like a bootlicker. You are part of the bewildered rabble they despise.
Most Americans retire from their mutual funds, 401k, real estate etc. A capital gains tax at nearly 50% would virtually end all hope for a middle class person to retire comfortably, while still allowing a 0.1% person to live the dream. Who is really getting crushed here?

Average Joe: Retires with a $500,000 gain after 30-40 years of letting his mutual funds grow and then loses half of it when he sells.

OR

0.1% Joe: Makes a $20,000,000 gain and then loses half when he sells.

All you would be doing is preventing the middle class person from retiring, while not effecting the very top from being able to retire.
 
Old 10-04-2015, 01:28 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Yes, lets make a poor, elderly widow pay the same rate as the billionaire. How about we start taxing capital gains at Scandinavian rates of 28-42%.
Sure, as soon as we implement a 25% VAT tax that EVERYONE pays, and not tax foreign-earned income. Deal?
 
Old 10-04-2015, 01:32 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Most Americans retire from their mutual funds, 401k, real estate etc. A capital gains tax at nearly 50% would virtually end all hope for a middle class person to retire comfortably, while still allowing a 0.1% person to live the dream. Who is really getting crushed here?

Average Joe: Retires with a $500,000 gain after 30-40 years of letting his mutual funds grow and then loses half of it when he sells.

OR

0.1% Joe: Makes a $20,000,000 gain and then loses half when he sells.

All you would be doing is preventing the middle class person from retiring, while not effecting the very top from being able to retire.
I'm thinking that's what they want.
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:34 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,967,844 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Most Americans retire from their mutual funds, 401k, real estate etc. A capital gains tax at nearly 50% would virtually end all hope for a middle class person to retire comfortably, while still allowing a 0.1% person to live the dream. Who is really getting crushed here?

Average Joe: Retires with a $500,000 gain after 30-40 years of letting his mutual funds grow and then loses half of it when he sells.

OR

0.1% Joe: Makes a $20,000,000 gain and then loses half when he sells.

All you would be doing is preventing the middle class person from retiring, while not effecting the very top from being able to retire.
Easy solution. Expand social security like the vast majority of Americans want and which is how Scandinavia does it, and implement exemptions and deductions on the first few thousands of capital gains. The fact of the matter is that people in Scandinavia can retire faaaaar more comfortably and securely than Americans.
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:37 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Easy solution. Expand social security like the vast majority of Americans want and which is how Scandinavia does it, and implement a exemptions and deductions on the first few thousands of capital gains.
Like I said, I'd agree to that as soon as we implement a 25% VAT tax that EVERYONE pays and stop taxing foreign-earned income, just like the Scandinavian countries. Deal?
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:41 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,967,844 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Like I said, I'd agree to that as soon as we implement a 25% VAT tax that EVERYONE pays and stop taxing foreign-earned income, just like the Scandinavian countries. Deal?
I dont have any problems with a 25% VAT when minimum wage is $17-20 an hour, with extremely good benefits and no person worries about paying $20 000 a year for child care, private health insurance and college tuition. There is no cap on income subject to payroll tax in Scandinavia. There is, however a maximum cap on what you can get when you retire. That is why it is a social safety net. No matter what happens to you or your employer or the stock market, you are guaranteed a good retirement income.

Do you honestly think poor and working class people in Scandinavian countries want to live in the US because they have to pay 25% VAT in Scandinavia?
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:45 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
I dont have any problems with a 25% VAT when minimum wage is $17-20 an hour, with extremely good benefits and no worries about paying $20 000 a year for child care, private health insurance and college tuition.

Do you honestly think poor and working class people in Scandinavian countries want to live in the US because they have to pay 25% VAT in Scandinavia?
The unemployed in Scandinavia aren't earning $17-20 an hour and they STILL pay the 25% VAT tax just like everyone else.
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:53 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,967,844 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
The unemployed in Scandinavia aren't earning $17-20 an hour and they STILL pay the 25% VAT tax just like everyone else.
Unemployment benefits in Scandinavia are faaaaar better than in the US. Generally, you get 80% of your former pay for up to 3 years, depending on the country. You get retraining and educational opportunities in order to quickly find another job. This is what a social safety net is about.

More people work in Scandinavia than in the US.
 
Old 10-04-2015, 08:57 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Unemployment benefits in Scandinavia are faaaaar better than in the US.
Yeah, because EVERYONE pays the 25% VAT tax, which is their greatest source of tax revenue. That's why their benefits are so much better. EVERYONE pays. EVERYONE contributes to the cost of those social safety net programs.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top