Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2015, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Kansas
26,239 posts, read 22,415,097 times
Reputation: 27122

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
The poll was 555 likely voters, BTW, and Roanoke was pretty accurate in 2008 and 2012.

How long before shrill, loony teebaggers begin shrieking that the "polls are biased"? Just like they whined in 2008 and 2012.

LOL

Virginia = voted for Obama twice. 2 Dem senators. A liberal Dem governor.

VA = the next blue state. All thanks to liberal, educated Northern Virginia, where over 1/3 of all Virginians live.
"That was then, this is now." The world has changed so much since that time. Trump is finally talking about the REAL problems in the country, the ones many of us have been trying to get addressed at least since 2008. He isn't allowing the diversion tactics that the established party candidates usually pull about this time before election.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California View Post
My question is, why aren't the Cankleistas talking her/it up instead of spending all their time bashing republicans, hmmmm?
Ah, in "talking her up", I think they find themselves looking for what they could say and when they realize what there is to say they just and focus on the GOP nominating their worst candidate knowing that most GOP candidates would beat her pants suit off.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...lysis-november

Last edited by AnywhereElse; 11-29-2015 at 06:54 AM..

 
Old 11-29-2015, 06:47 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,817,272 times
Reputation: 21098
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Did you read the poll questions starting with question 62?.
I did. In fact that's how I realized they were polling people not registered to vote.

Doesn't change what I said.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 08:02 AM
 
4,982 posts, read 3,305,526 times
Reputation: 2739
Just wait till Hillary has to start talking again. The more America hears her the more America falls out of love with the gotta have a woman president meme.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 08:04 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,997,597 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
The poll was 555 likely voters, BTW, and Roanoke was pretty accurate in 2008 and 2012.

How long before shrill, loony teebaggers begin shrieking that the "polls are biased"? Just like they whined in 2008 and 2012.

LOL

Virginia = voted for Obama twice. 2 Dem senators. A liberal Dem governor.

VA = the next blue state. All thanks to liberal, educated Northern Virginia, where over 1/3 of all Virginians live.
All thanks to government drones who have populated N.Va. like flies along with the ever-growing, ever-expanding behemoth that is the bloated and useless federal government.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Richmond,VA
3,842 posts, read 3,094,018 times
Reputation: 2830
NoVa voters will vote democratic so they continue to get up in the morning and go to their government jobs and watch porn all day.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Arlington VA
549 posts, read 628,300 times
Reputation: 603
Historically, Republican presidents have always INCREASED federal spending and the size of the federal government, while Democrat presidents have always decreased it. So that talking point makes absolutely zero logical sense, and is therefore easily debunked.

If you want a bloated and useless federal government, then by all means vote GOP. Because that is precisely what you'll get. Thankfully, NoVa is smart enough not to fall for it, and we will deliver Virgina for Hillary in 2016.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 09:31 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,817,272 times
Reputation: 21098
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
Historically, Republican presidents have always INCREASED federal spending and the size of the federal government, while Democrat presidents have always decreased it. So that talking point makes absolutely zero logical sense, and is therefore easily debunked.

Simply not true.

Obama’s Spending: ‘Inferno’ or Not?
 
Old 11-29-2015, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,242,260 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
Historically, Republican presidents have always INCREASED federal spending and the size of the federal government, while Democrat presidents have always decreased it. So that talking point makes absolutely zero logical sense, and is therefore easily debunked.

If you want a bloated and useless federal government, then by all means vote GOP. Because that is precisely what you'll get. Thankfully, NoVa is smart enough not to fall for it, and we will deliver Virgina for Hillary in 2016.
Look at this guy. Typical NOVA millenial clone.
 
Old 11-29-2015, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Arlington VA
549 posts, read 628,300 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post


Um...a little thing called the "Great Bush Recession" happened.

Perhaps you've heard of it?
 
Old 11-29-2015, 10:37 AM
 
Location: SW Virginia
2,189 posts, read 1,424,680 times
Reputation: 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
Historically, Republican presidents have always INCREASED federal spending and the size of the federal government, while Democrat presidents have always decreased it.

I believe you have it backwards, but anyway:

Yeah, just like Obama did...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top