Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He had a chance to make a difference in the campaign and to influence the party going forward. Now he is done. More evidence that Trump is destroying the Republican party.
you don't think Paul will give Trump an endorsement?
I don't understand why. He got 2% in Iowa, after spending somethings like $70 million! He will never get more than that, so why isn't he being pressured by his supporters to drop out and give the money to another similar candidate without the baggage of his family? It's far too soon for another Bush to think he can win the election. What were they thinking?
Bush put more of a focus on New Hampshire than Iowa, so he might be waiting to see how he does there (similar to Christie and Kasich)
Bush is counting on all these other weaklings dropping out and the possible chance that he can garner their support.....with Trumps gigantic unfavorables, you can figure they won't head toward his camp......
Sad to hear that about Rand. I think if he had just stuck to his original message of less wars, states rights he would've had more support. Instead he moved to the right, and tried to move back during the last debate but it was too late
Bush is counting on all these other weaklings dropping out and the possible chance that he can garner their support.....with Trumps gigantic unfavorables, you can figure they won't head toward his camp......
Bush likely has the financial backing to be the only sitting/ prior governor to go the distance with Trump, Cruz and Rubio.
I think after Bush, Christie and Kasich lose in NH, they are going to be next.
I just read it on Yahoo. I think he did it now, more to concentrate on his race for the senate I am guessing Christie will hang in there for awhile if he does anything next week, same with Bush.
Sad to hear that about Rand. I think if he had just stuck to his original message of less wars, states rights he would've had more support. Instead he moved to the right, and tried to move back during the last debate but it was too late
Rand's position on meddling is too similar to Obama's.
Rand failed to attract the backing of billionaires.
He will likely be more effective in the Senate, assuming he can retain his job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
