Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I agree that Sanders seems to be an alternative, which is probably why people prefer Trump to him. Many people don't like real changes, especially in the US.
Look at companies such as McDonalds or Walmart. Employees don't earn much, but the owners, shareholders and officers are filthy rich. That is the kind of system Trump stands for, Americans are naive if they think electing Trump will help the masses.
Ummmm....
You do realize that Hillary Clinton use to be on the Board of Directors for Walmart from 1986 to 1992. She only left, because her husband won the presidency. She was given $100,000 of stock that was put into her trust and is worth over $1,000,000 today. She had this stock when she claimed to be "dead broke" when leaving the White House.....making her so much more relateable to the lemmings.
Will Democrats be able to effectively play the Walmart is evil card, after they elect Hillary Rodham-Walmart-Clinton to the White House?
P.S. About a third of Walmart Stock is owned by pensions...pensions that help middle class workers. Part of the rest is owned by stock funds inside of middle class IRAs and 401Ks.
I live in a poor country where the middle class has also been reduced quite a bit. Still, there is no radicalization like in the US. People remain calm, no crazy president or anything.
And there is little if anything a president can do about the rise of emerging countries, it is the natural course of things. We, i.e. the West, have no monopoly on a good life, others will eventually catch up, and we will go down a bit. And that's OK. What goes up must come down. Nothing grows forever in a closed system such as Earth.
It's not that there is not enough money in countries such as the US. But greed and egoistic priorities and goals lead to a very unfair distribution of wealth. Look at companies such as McDonalds or Walmart. Employees don't earn much, but the owners, shareholders and officers are filthy rich. That is the kind of system Trump stands for, Americans are naive if they think electing Trump will help the masses.
Nor can a country simply close its borders to products from abroad. There are trade organizations and contracts that prevent that. Not to mention that other countries would start to do the same, which would backfire on the US.
I agree that Sanders seems to be an alternative, which is probably why people prefer Trump to him. Many people don't like real changes, especially in the US.
Again, you miss the point. This time by a city block and country mile.
Trump and Sanders complement each other beautifully, they should be president and vice-president.
It is the single same power group, with its two hands, impeding the way of both.
And that's why you see now even some so-called republicans starting to openly support Hillary.
You do realize that Hillary Clinton use to be on the Board of Directors for Walmart from 1986 to 1992. She only left, because her husband won the presidency. She was given $100,000 of stock that was put into her trust and is worth over $1,000,000 today. She had this stock when she claimed to be "dead broke" when leaving the White House.....making her so much more relateable to the lemmings.
Will Democrats be able to effectively play the Walmart is evil card, after they elect Hillary Rodham-Walmart-Clinton to the White House?
P.S. About a third of Walmart Stock is owned by pensions...pensions that help middle class workers. Part of the rest is owned by stock funds inside of middle class IRAs and 401Ks.
excellent points, but that is supposed to be a secret.
i also remember when the clintons had to return a lot of stuff they stole from the white house.
You do realize that Hillary Clinton use to be on the Board of Directors for Walmart from 1986 to 1992. She only left, because her husband won the presidency. She was given $100,000 of stock that was put into her trust and is worth over $1,000,000 today. She had this stock when she claimed to be "dead broke" when leaving the White House.....making her so much more relateable to the lemmings.
Will Democrats be able to effectively play the Walmart is evil card, after they elect Hillary Rodham-Walmart-Clinton to the White House?
P.S. About a third of Walmart Stock is owned by pensions...pensions that help middle class workers. Part of the rest is owned by stock funds inside of middle class IRAs and 401Ks.
Still, more than half of Walmart is owned by "the Waltons"
I don't know of Clinton's involvement with that company, nor do I think that it matters to voters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
