Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why? If Trump was sitting in his courtroom and he said this, he would have gotten slapped with a contempt of court charge and thrown in jail for a few days.
Because judges arent supposed to be political, it actually emphasizes whats wrong with the system even more.
btw, he wasnt in a courtroom, so that part is immaterial.
Because judges arent supposed to be political, it actually emphasizes whats wrong with the system even more.
btw, he wasnt in a courtroom, so that part is immaterial.
The only somewhat political aspect is that there is a presumption that disclosure of such materials is in the public's interest, unless a compelling interest exists to the contrary. There is not. Besides, Trump's scam university is permanently defunct, so nonexistent trade secrets are a moot point. Like it or not, the judge made the right legal decision.
The 12-page order was filed yesterday. It's a complex and detailed document with many footnotes and specific citations, not something that was written on the fly. Trump's legal team would have known it was coming before it was released and before Trump made his speech.
So Trump's hissy fit was the result and not the cause of the order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50
It should be noted that he did this BEFORE Trump started his rant. I put a link in the other thread on the University lawsuit when it happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by snj90
The only somewhat political aspect is that there is a presumption that disclosure of such materials is in the public's interest, unless a compelling interest exists to the contrary. There is not. Besides, Trump's scam university is permanently defunct, so nonexistent trade secrets are a moot point. Like it or not, the judge made the right legal decision.
Yep, this is all bully Donald's reaction to something he didn't like. Once again, he attacks anyone who doesn't do exactly what he wants. Except in this case, he has no legal leg to stand on and all the whining and bullying in the world doesn't change that.
The most pathetic thing is the people who think that Donald has the right to level personal attacks at a judge who simply applied the law to the facts.
Once again, Trump is his own worst enemy........he just can not control himself. He never engages his brain before his mouth starts moving. That is going to be the true downfall of DT. I bet his advisors want to hang themselves.
Can you begin to imagine this man in talks with other world leaders ? He would create so much hostility , even with our allies, that it could do damage that might never be repaired entirely. The term "loose cannon" fits this man perfectly.
This is why no one wants him in the White House. Those that do - well, I cannot imageine how they think he will interact with other world leaders.
Suppose Putin snubs him? And we know the Donald 'only hits BACK'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man
You must spend every waking moment attempting to drum up phony stories about your next president, Mr D Trump.
You need to get a new hobby, Trump is going to be the next president and he is going to make America great again. You are going to love him very soon, so give it up, you can't win.....
Nothing phony about the story. Did you even read it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Because judges arent supposed to be political, it actually emphasizes whats wrong with the system even more.
btw, he wasnt in a courtroom, so that part is immaterial.
He made the ruling before Donnie made his racist remark.
Anti-Trumps will have ample time to present misinformation and slander the GOP nominee prior to the election. In their minds you are only innocent until proven guilty if you are Hillary.
Because judges arent supposed to be political, it actually emphasizes whats wrong with the system even more.
btw, he wasnt in a courtroom, so that part is immaterial.
If you look at the other links, as well as look at the report and requests, this really has nothing to do with Trump going after him, calling someone born in the U.S a "Mexican" or any of that. The release did coincide with Trump's comments, but this was already in the works.
There are lots of students every where that aren't happy with their education and couldn't use it to get a job. Got a lot of them working at Wal-mart with a 4 year degree. Trump will change that given time.
The judge didn't quickly write his long 12 page decision after Trump made his 'hater' Mexican remarks. That the decision was released the same day as Trump's remarks is a coincidence. If anything it was Trump ranting in anticipation of the judge's decision.
Anti-Trumps will have ample time to present misinformation and slander the GOP nominee prior to the election. In their minds you are only innocent until proven guilty if you are Hillary.
You do know that there are two separate cases against Trump U, right? You are referencing NY AG's action (the list you link is absurdly one-sided, FWIW). This thread is about the civil case.
Mick
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
