Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-31-2016, 08:15 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,814,473 times
Reputation: 21098

Advertisements

The Trump Deranged will be shattered yet again when they find there is nothing of note in those documents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2016, 08:26 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,723,995 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Love how the mouthpiece makes the connection of the judge being a 'trump hater' to his membership in a professional lawyer's organization. I guess you just can't join an association without endangering any future cases, eh? Or, did he join it just because he had a case involving trump? Plus, he is somehow involved in the protests...

I especially like this from the link:
"Well, it's because of what we see outside of these rallies, these anti-Trump rallies, these criminal rallies, these criminal protesters out there defacing property and attacking police officers," Pierson said.
"They're doing so under the guise of an anti-Trump protest, with their Mexican flags, and La Raza and this judge is connected to that."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 08:32 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,723,995 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
On what basis do you think he should be disqualified?
Trump is not running against Obama or a Hispanic.
Do you think only a Republican appointed Caucasian should be allowed to hear the case?
Well, yes, I believe they think that. The priceless combination of being appointed by obama and being a minority is enough to send trump followers into apoplexy over the unfairness of it all.

I bet trump comes out soon with a policy statement that on the first day, he will undo all of obama's judicial appointments. Of course, that would tie up the court system for a long time, because he wouldn't have any idea who to appoint that would match his expectations... not a minority, not ever appointed to be a judge by anyone who he disagrees with or who might possibly have to hear a case against him, not a member of certain off-limits professional associations. But, not to worry, because it would make trump safe from the courts, at least for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 08:36 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,723,995 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
The Trump Deranged will be shattered yet again when they find there is nothing of note in those documents.
The point is not whether there is nothing of note in the documents... the point is the deranged way trump responded to being told the documents had to be unsealed for the trial. You know, the trial he wanted because he didn't want to settle and keep the details private.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 09:03 AM
 
19,963 posts, read 12,250,412 times
Reputation: 17682
Quote:
Originally Posted by kat in aiken View Post
You do realize that the document you reference is a document in an ongoing case that started long before the date of the document? Unless you believe that each and every thread that discusses trump in a less than complimentary light is a troll thread? Oh, wait, of course you believe that!
Dial it down a notch. Read the title of this thread slowly for comprehension. OP intentionally worded it to imply the judge unsealed the records as a result of Trump's comments. That is what makes it a troll thread. Stop projecting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 09:09 AM
 
63,499 posts, read 29,523,733 times
Reputation: 18803
Quote:
Originally Posted by kat in aiken View Post
Love how the mouthpiece makes the connection of the judge being a 'trump hater' to his membership in a professional lawyer's organization. I guess you just can't join an association without endangering any future cases, eh? Or, did he join it just because he had a case involving trump? Plus, he is somehow involved in the protests...

I especially like this from the link:
"Well, it's because of what we see outside of these rallies, these anti-Trump rallies, these criminal rallies, these criminal protesters out there defacing property and attacking police officers," Pierson said.
"They're doing so under the guise of an anti-Trump protest, with their Mexican flags, and La Raza and this judge is connected to that."

So what part of the judge had connections to La Raza didn't you get? There is an obvious bias on his part. La Raza is a huge advocacy group for illegal aliens and Trump's agenda is quite the opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 09:14 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,176,424 times
Reputation: 8031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
So what part of the judge had connections to La Raza didn't you get? There is an obvious bias on his part. La Raza is a huge advocacy group for illegal aliens and Trump's agenda is quite the opposite.
Do you think every organization with "La Raza" in its name are affiliated with each other?

It's just a San Diego Latino/Latina Lawyers Association: San Diego's Latino/Latina Bar Association |

Please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 09:29 AM
Status: "Felon Trump" (set 13 days ago)
 
13,733 posts, read 9,079,360 times
Reputation: 10503
I do wonder that Donald John Trump has not vigorously attacked the Attorney General for the state of New York concerning the civil fraud action filed by that office in 2013 (prior to Trump's announcement that he was running for president).

Now, Mr. Trump and his attorneys are, of course, fighting the suit itself. As noted a few days ago, a New York appeals court ruled that Mr. Trump may appeal to the high court the issue about whether the Attorney General's suit may be dismissed or go to trial on the merits (a lower court said the trail may proceed; Trump is appealing that ruling, seemingly). Hence, there is no possibility of there being a trial before the election.

Anyway, I would advise Mr. Trump to show no prejudice, and to attack the NY attorney general forthwith. The attorney general's name is Eric Schneiderman, although Mr. Trump may easily convert it to "Erico Sanchezman" or such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 10:16 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,723,995 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
So what part of the judge had connections to La Raza didn't you get? There is an obvious bias on his part. La Raza is a huge advocacy group for illegal aliens and Trump's agenda is quite the opposite.
The judge is a member or an organization of professional lawyers who are "Latino". That is kinda like being a member of AARP if you are at least 50, or a member of Blacks in Government if you are a black who is in government. There is no de facto bias involved, just trump's delusional dreaming that he will get his way if he is crappy enough about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 10:35 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,143 posts, read 16,280,537 times
Reputation: 28409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Oh, please. Talk about grasping for straws. My husband is a member of the National Bar Association, which was associated with support of Farrakhan's Million Man March, but he sure as heck isn't a Farrakhan fan.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top