New York State Trump University fraud lawsuit gets the green light again! (borders, terrorist)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No one cares. A tiny handful of disgruntled people vs thousands who went to the university and are very happy. Keeping hoping you can come up with something new.
If a 100 people go to a restaurant and only 25 of them get food poisoning the health department still has an obligation to investigate and possibly close them down until the source of food poison can be identified. Over 25% of the people who went to Trump U asked for their money back. That's not a "tiny handful of disgruntle people."
Quote:
Originally Posted by kat in aiken
That is like saying the moon rises after the sun sets. So the moon is following the sun.
If a 100 people go to a restaurant and only 25 of them get food poisoning the health department still has an obligation to investigate and possibly close them down until the source of food poison can be identified. Over 25% of the people who went to Trump U asked for their money back. That's not a "tiny handful of disgruntle people."
Trumpette logic.
This isn't food poisoning.
In fact, the people bringing the suit gave Trumps U a good review.
People aren't willing to do the work it takes to be successful in real estate, and a lawyer tells them to sue.
Trump University students—the very ones used by the presumptive Republican nominee’s legal team as evidence of that satisfaction—now tell The Daily Beast they were coerced into providing positive reviews and conned out of their life’s savings with little to show for their trouble besides a mountain of debt.
Wrong - the New York case is different from the California case... different judges, different region, different state.
And - OMG! - in NY, there are FOUR judges that trump can bloviate about!
In a unanimous ruling, a four-judge panel of the state Appellate Division said the state attorney general’s office is “authorized to bring a cause of action for fraud†— despite the bloviating billionaire’s claims to the contrary.
If he is delaying it, it could be because he wants it hanging over Trump's head--maybe he's milking it for all the bad press it might be worth.
If he were to go through the trial now, perhaps it would be found to have no merit and be wrapped up quickly.
So, even though trump's lawyers asked for the delay, he is biased because he gave them what they asked for? Is that even logical? Well, I mean... since trump's lawyers also support hillary, maybe they did it deliberately? Yet another instance in which the whole world is against trump, right?
Wrong - the New York case is different from the California case... different judges, different region, different state.
there are 3 cases:
* (formerly) makaeff, san diego CA, judge curiel
* cohen, san diego CA, judge curiel ( this one looks to be a RICO trial and is the one i thought you were talking about )
* NY, different judge
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
