"I yelled ‘Black lives matter!’ at a Trump rally. This is what happened next." (voters, enemy)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
BLM is not even close to the KKK. They're not out there hanging whites in large numbers.
The environment isn't one where they would be able to get away with that. But there is an extremist element to BLM. Many of their protest had rioting involved. And there was the group who beat up the vet minding his own business coming out of a MacDonalds. These days hate or extremist groups aren't out killing people in large numbers in this country. Well, except one, but that's another topic.
"As the president of the United States a person is the president of all people in the United States. Not showing neutrality toward all organizations who have different views from each other should not be tolerated."
That double negative in the second sentence makes it difficult to decipher, but I think I get it now. You are saying that a president should show tolerance towards hate groups like the KKK.
Good grief.
No that means that he is not supposed to label any organization as a hate group. Calling a group a hate group is not neutrality. The president should not discriminate against anyone.
If you all would use my sis Google for her intended purpose, or even just SCROLL down a few inches, you could get detailed, well thought out answers to your questions. But you won't, yet you call OTHER groups uneducated and lazy....which is really funny.
No that means that he is not supposed to label any organization as a hate group. Calling a group a hate group is not neutrality. The president should not discriminate against anyone.
So it's your contention that the KKK is not a hate group? Seriously? And I suppose a president should never label ISIS as a hate group, either, as that would not be "neutrality."
She's not special because she's black. It's not something she earned. She's not special for being rude. Too bad the Washington Post encourages her to act out like some spoiled wild child. They aren't doing her any favors.
If black lives mattered that much to her why isn't she yelling that in the middle of the street in the hoods of Chicago where there are daily killings of blacks by other blacks!
She's not special because she's black. It's not something she earned. She's not special for being rude. Too bad the Washington Post encourages her to act out like some spoiled wild child. They aren't doing her any favors.
This will just 'inspire' more 'activists' to do the same thing.
Using figures for the 2013 racial mix of the population–62.2 percent white, 17.1 percent Hispanic, 13.2 percent black–we can calculate the average likelihood of a person of each race attacking the other. A black is 27 times more likely to attack a white and 8 times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the other way around. A Hispanic is eight times more likely to attack a white than vice versa.
Yes, LET'S have a conversation about which race is more likely to attack another.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
