Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2016, 09:37 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,660,176 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
Hillary Clinton never counted on the "White Male" -- they didn't like her in 2008 and they like her even less in 2016.
If Hillary can't rely on the blue collar union voter, she is going to lose every state in the Rust Belt.

I do agree with you about the under 25 vote. And every time the very gaunt frail looking Bill Clinton is rolled out, they question how the Clintons understand anything about them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2016, 09:57 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,279,753 times
Reputation: 11909
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
maybe.. that segment of society is very uneducated, dont pay taxes, dont have real jobs etc, and get their "news" from Facebook where their own crowd, hates Trump..

The question comes down to who do they hate more, and its probably Trump, who they blame for their own problems..
Those "uneducated" are racking up massive college loans for their 'uneducation', but the rest of that sentence is spot on. On the other hand -- a few of the "under 25" Kiddos might just be interested in more Jobs in this country and better Jobs than working at Starbucks or Target. They already know how poorly that situation has been during the O-Regime and may just think another 4-8 years of the same policies are not what they want. They may want to get out of Mama's basement.

Hillary doesn't have a record of doing anything for Women - it's all this "time for the 1st Woman President" and Grand Legacy stuff. She also has a BAD record on Gay/Lesbian Issues and while
she Flips the Flop now - they all know that record. Some will certainly vote for her -- but most will just shrug and not vote at all. That was a huge base for Obama.

For those who like to stereotype Hispanics, and say Hispanic Males won't vote for Hillary because they are "macho" or something ..... the Clinton name means a lot to many older Hispanics.
She will get a lot of their vote - but not the younger Hispanics or those that are more concerned about the economy and the illegal alien invasion. Don't kid yourself - many Legal Hispanics want the border secured. They fear the Narcos that are setting up operations in the USA, and they don't want to illegals under-cutting them on the job market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Gods country
8,105 posts, read 6,759,548 times
Reputation: 10421
This white male greatly despises her. Although, I do respect her for telling me exactly who she represents by her hate for the police and embrace of the BLM crew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,966 posts, read 22,149,005 times
Reputation: 26724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Hispanic men in Brazil, had no problem electing a woman president and re-electing her for a second term.

White men in the UK had no problem electing Thatcher.

White men in Germany had no problem electing Merkel.

Perhaps it is only "macho" white American men who have a problem with women.

Got any other 'theories' that make no logical sense whatsoever?
Don't give all the credit to men. I am a white woman totally disgusted by Hillary. A woman as POTUS would be less effective than a male when dealing with 3rd world countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:43 AM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,144,382 times
Reputation: 6338
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
Don't give all the credit to men. I am a white woman totally disgusted by Hillary. A woman as POTUS would be less effective than a male when dealing with 3rd world countries.
I actually wouldn't call Hillary your "average woman". I think she's very cold stoned and stern. There's a reason why people call her a "war hawk". I don't think she will be "emotional" like you're trying to imply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:45 AM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,332,892 times
Reputation: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUTGR View Post

Don't think there's a problem! White Males didn't put Obama in the White House twice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Sioux Falls, SD area
4,875 posts, read 6,937,609 times
Reputation: 10201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
I actually wouldn't call Hillary your "average woman". I think she's very cold stoned and stern. There's a reason why people call her a "war hawk". I don't think she will be "emotional" like you're trying to imply.

The "Hildabeast". Pantsuits will never be considered stylish again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,239 posts, read 27,635,783 times
Reputation: 16075
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
Hillary also has a hispanic and muslim male problem. They come from a "macho" culture that does not like taking orders from women.
Not according to city data posters. city loves her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 11:13 AM
 
Location: The Mitten.
2,538 posts, read 3,105,287 times
Reputation: 8990
Who gives a ***** who white males vote for? They're an endangered species, and getting rarer by the day, sperm-health wise.
Luckily there's no Sierra Club for the old boys' club.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 12:40 PM
 
2,973 posts, read 1,977,564 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Didn't Obama lose white males by a 30-40 point margin? I expect Trump to win white males by at least a 20-25 point margin. It won't be enough however.
Romney 62 - 35 Obama among white males
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top