Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary, after losing 7 of the last 8 races to Bernie plans to take the classic Clinton campaign tactic. Bring out the Hell Hounds to go after Bernie.
I find it remarkable that Hillary has lost so many primaries and caucuses after spending an astonishing $150,000,000 on the campaign so for. This, against an opponent with one hand tied behind his back by the DNC.
It exposes Hillary's fundamental flaws as a general election candidate.
People who say if Bernie doesn't win, I will vote for Gary Johnson make ZERO SENSE. It makes me truly wonder if they just like the names and news stories and not the actual issues at hand.
People who say if Bernie doesn't win, I will vote for Gary Johnson make ZERO SENSE. It makes me truly wonder if they just like the names and news stories and not the actual issues at hand.
What makes zero sense?
I like a consistent philosophy that applies to both businesses and individuals/families (none of this crony capitalism business while imposing a ton of regulations on small businesses), strong civil liberties, and I don't want the US getting involved with other countries' affairs.
There's more, but my point is, if you'd look at the candidates more than just superficially, you'd see that there are similarities between the two. Not in every way, but in particular ways such that I support them both.
Hmmmm, tough choice....I really don't believe in Socialism....but if I had the choice between a socialist and an unqualified lying, cheating, sociopath....sheesh, really not that tough of a choice now, is it
^Agreed, there's no way I would even consider voting for a Socialist, especially seeing how much our taxes would go up under a Sanders administration. A government having that much control over people's lives? No thank you. And I'm sure he'd want to have Tulsi Gabbard as his VP, who is ridiculously unqualified to be president.
Hillary is easily the best qualified candidate. It's not rocket science.
Hillary Clinton is a candidate of the 1990s trying to win in the 21st century.
So. Reagan was a political figure in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s, who finally got his crack as a doddering old fool in the 80s...
Quote:
She only knows identity politics and going on the attack. I'm sure now, she's gonna open up on Bernie with everything she's got.
Good. He's a back-bench, do-nothing, career congressman that's been trying to 'Bern' down the democrat party with disgusting right-wing attacks since he entered the race...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
