Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump supporters are completely clueless. They fail to comprehend that Trump is turning solidly red states like UTAH and MISSISSIPPI into potential swing states if it comes down to Trump vs Hillary.
I am convinced more than ever that Trump is a Democrat plant designed to sink the GOP's chances in 2016. And if he hands the Dems control of Congress ... well the more the merrier.
The GOP is perfectly capable of sinking its own ship. See 2008/2012 & Ted Cruz for recent examples.
I am convinced more than ever that Trump is a Democrat plant designed to sink the GOP's chances in 2016. And if he hands the Dems control of Congress ... well the more the merrier.
Just for the sake of argument let's say this is true. How does a plant do so well? Would that be the fault of those who did this or the fault of those being rejected?
Would Trump be in the position he is in unless a large number of people saw the alternative as no longer a viable option?
The solution is to vote for those who have failed you so many times because why?
If the Republican power brokers go against the will of the people at the convention and deny Trump, then it's time for people who support the GOP to stop supporting them, as the GOP will be a dictatorship. If this happens, it will destroy the Republican party- and deservedly so.
If the Republican power brokers go against the will of the people at the convention and deny Trump, then it's time for people who support the GOP to stop supporting them, as the GOP will be a dictatorship. If this happens, it will destroy the Republican party- and deservedly so.
If Trump can't get 1237 delegates, the will of "the people" has spoken, and he shouldn't be the nominee.
Why is it that Trump's supporters think "the people" means the @35% who voted for Trump, but not the @65% who voted against him?
It should be the guy who can get 1237 Republican delegates at the convention. This is not the first time in history no candidate has had 1237 delegates going into the convention.
If Trump comes up short and then at the convention gets to 1237, fine he's the nominee. If he can't, which I don't think he will, then whoever DOES get 1237 delegates is the nominee. That's how it works for those of you who are new to politics.
It should be the guy who can get 1237 Republican delegates at the convention. This is not the first time in history no candidate has had 1237 delegates going into the convention.
So that would be "yes, possibly the guy that got zero votes". Right? Why not just say it?
Quote:
If Trump comes up short and then at the convention gets to 1237, fine he's the nominee. If he can't, which I don't think he will, then whoever DOES get 1237 delegates is the nominee. That's how it works for those of you who are new to politics.
The reason Trump is doing as well as he is because people are paying attention and have grown tired of the old politics.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.