Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:11 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,092,041 times
Reputation: 14688

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
ARF, arf, arf

If you don't learn the language of your leader you won't be an effective follower. Stay in school or be the fool.
What is the language of fat orange ignorant bigots?**

**(Look up Archie Bunker for the answer to that question.)

No, I don't want Warren to be Clinton's VP. She is a strong progressive voice in the Senate, and Clinton will need her there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:25 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
5,046 posts, read 7,432,031 times
Reputation: 8720
Having a Clinton-Warren ticket would fire up a lot of progressives and women, and further demoralize the smaller numbers of uneducated white males who are in a love affair with Donald. Since women make up the majority of voters I think this ticket would be unstoppable! The curve will start getting too steep for poor old Donny, and he will have to go back to doing what he knows best: bankrupting casinos and exploiting his foreign-born wives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,056,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Whether or not she would be a good idea for Democrat VP, Clinton would never pick someone who would outshine her with the public, popularity-wise. Come to think of it, I don't think Trump would, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Eastern Tennessee
4,385 posts, read 4,400,604 times
Reputation: 12709
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Whether or not she would be a good idea for Democrat VP, Clinton would never pick someone who would outshine her with the public, popularity-wise. Come to think of it, I don't think Trump would, either.
I agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 11:01 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,682,784 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries63 View Post
Having a Clinton-Warren ticket would fire up a lot of progressives and women, ......
So the logic of this, is that if Warren isn't on the ticket, progressives & women won't be "fired up" and support Clinton.

OK.


(Given that logic, Pocahontas should be running for the top job.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 11:20 AM
JRR
 
Location: Middle Tennessee
8,168 posts, read 5,677,535 times
Reputation: 15703
Just out of curiosity, where would the right and Clinton/Warren be going on their "field trip"? Maybe a day tour of Washington?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,372,081 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries63 View Post
Having a Clinton-Warren ticket would fire up a lot of progressives and women, and further demoralize the smaller numbers of uneducated white males who are in a love affair with Donald. Since women make up the majority of voters I think this ticket would be unstoppable! The curve will start getting too steep for poor old Donny, and he will have to go back to doing what he knows best: bankrupting casinos and exploiting his foreign-born wives.
Trump will also step up his habit of making misogynistic remarks even more, which is a wonderful way of pouring gasoline on a fire - and will do nothing to reverse his unfavorables with women voters overall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 02:52 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,660,152 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Elizabeth Warren looks like she is getting a heart attack or is getting some thrill up her leg moment when she talks about helping Hilliary!

It is almost laughable and amusing if both will run together. The probably will get the left feminist women vote, but what about the category not spoken about..." male vote"!

What about the Native American votes and women who are more moderate and don't see them as an example of class, honesty, ethical, etc.

Warren looks like a mad/angry lefty.... she looks like a woman on steroids that can explode at any moment.
Nothing worse than an angry, powerful woman who speaks the truth to scare you, huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,978 posts, read 22,169,754 times
Reputation: 26745
Oh, my gosh, the more I learn the more I want that ticket:

Elizabeth Warren is dangerously wrong about everything: Part I | Human Events

Elizabeth Warren is dangerously wrong about almost everything: Part II | Human Events

A $22.00 minimum wage? That should get the businessmen out in droves to vote for her.

She is more an Obama than Hillary or so it seems to me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,967,937 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsb62574 View Post
She decimated Trump in her speech, and a new poll shows Trump down 11% among independent voters. This poll was conducted prior to Clinton consolidating democrats, and an even bigger bump is expected. Warren can influence Sanders' voters, and in a fit of uniformed zealousness, Trump and his supporters will make these asinine comments (not on policy or substance, but things like the posts above) about her and turn the Sanders crowd off before he is even out of the gate. In addition, we have had all male tickets that have served throughout the history of this country. Where was the concern for the women's voice? While I doubt she will be the pick for VP, it will not be good news for Trump. I don't think Trump is at all prepared for an election against real candidates. This isn't the republican primaries.

As an aside, Trump embarrasses me as a white male. I think we can safely assume I am not alone since the leaders of your party are treating him like a leper.
I saw her speech and she showed how an articulate woman can mince Don the ****** into shreds. Clinton and Warren would be wonderful and would bring in Sanders voters who weren't going to vote.

Trump will respond with insults, which will further cement independent voters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top