Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A number of media organizations, including CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, The Washington Post and The New York Times have joined forces in an attempt to gain access to Trump's videotaped depositions in the Trump University lawsuit.
"The strong public interest in this case, which involves serious, allegations of fraud that have become a prominent issue in the 2016 presidential campaign, weighs in favor of public disclosure of materials produced in the course of the litigation.”
A number of media organizations, including CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, The Washington Post and The New York Times have joined forces in an attempt to gain access to Trump's videotaped depositions in the Trump University lawsuit.
"The strong public interest in this case, which involves serious, allegations of fraud that have become a prominent issue in the 2016 presidential campaign, weighs in favor of public disclosure of materials produced in the course of the litigation.”
Been there, done that a quarter of a century years ago. Nothing came of it because there's no "there" there. Nice attempt at diversion, though.
Then why not release the indictments, and let the public decide. I mean, if there's no, "there", there.
You don't draw up indictments for the first lady if she never broke the law. The fact of the matter is that she broke the law, indictments were drawn up, but the DOJ refused to present them to a grand jury.
"Further, one of the things that's alleged by the named plaintiff who withdrew in this case is that in the portion of the deposition that hasn't been unsealed, Trump threatened her and told her he would financially ruin her. Given that Trump has been selling the false story that she withdrew because she "was a disaster," you can bet that any release of this portion of the transcript would likewise be used against Trump in ads."
"Further, one of the things that's alleged by the named plaintiff who withdrew in this case is that in the portion of the deposition that hasn't been unsealed, Trump threatened her and told her he would financially ruin her. Given that Trump has been selling the false story that she withdrew because she "was a disaster," you can bet that any release of this portion of the transcript would likewise be used against Trump in ads."
She was such "a disaster" that the judge ordered The Donald to pay her nearly $800,000 in legal fees!
"Plaintiffs’ attorneys argue that the videos are important because they contain “many spontaneous and ad hominem remarks” that are not reflected in the transcript.
Trump’s tone, facial expressions, gestures and body language accentuate his “complete and utter unfamiliarity” with the school’s instructors, when Trump claimed he had hand-picked them, the attorneys wrote in a motion seeking to file the videos with the court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
