Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:26 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,364 posts, read 54,587,695 times
Reputation: 40841

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeymags View Post
Would Hillary sign a bill that prohibited people being investigated by the FBI from buying guns and running for president? Serious question. Or is her candidacy more important to her than a way she thinks will save lives?
The same FBI under fire for apparently dropping the ball on the Orlando shooter?

Why should she or anyone else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:28 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 5,310,580 times
Reputation: 11477
Forget every other issue or words spoken for a split second.

What he said is not only what people want to hear, but it's a logical step to take regardless of what has happened in the past with government and gun control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:32 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,364 posts, read 54,587,695 times
Reputation: 40841
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
Forget every other issue or words spoken for a split second.

What he said is not only what people want to hear, but it's a logical step to take regardless of what has happened in the past with government and gun control.
Why is it a "logical step" to talk about taking Constitutional rights away from Americans convicted of nothing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 105,064,062 times
Reputation: 49251
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1 View Post
the one thing about donald trump, like him or not, he will not make decisions based on republican or democrat. Like him or not, that is refreshing. We all should follow suit.
not!!!!!!!
BTW: I do think meeting with them is a good idea, but if it happens I don't see a thing coming from it, nor do I think he cares so much about banning anything: he is pandering to the "other side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:34 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 5,310,580 times
Reputation: 11477
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Why is it a "logical step" to talk about taking Constitutional rights away from Americans convicted of nothing?
Because these words: "not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns", has nothing to do with law abiding citizens and their right to bear arms. Too many pro gun people use the "rights" excuse in the wrong manner. I for one would think it a big step if legislation was passed adhering to the quote above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:38 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,148,574 times
Reputation: 8011
I am interested more in what would come out of the meeting.

NRA will not, in million year, budge on this (their silly "slippery slope" argument). Then what would Mr. Trump say? Very curious.

I do commend Mr. Trump on doing something completely unconventional for a Republican. I am not sure if he is doing this with his eyes wide open.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:39 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,364 posts, read 54,587,695 times
Reputation: 40841
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
Because these words: "not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns", has nothing to do with law abiding citizens and their right to bear arms. Too many pro gun people use the "rights" excuse in the wrong manner. I for one would think it a big step if legislation was passed adhering to the quote above.
What part of "watch list" is it that makes you believe everyone on it is not a law abiding citizen?

Or would you just like to see a wholesale suspension of due-process?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:50 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,988,674 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
not!!!!!!!
BTW: I do think meeting with them is a good idea, but if it happens I don't see a thing coming from it, nor do I think he cares so much about banning anything: he is pandering to the "other side.
Maybe, maybe not. Trump has always been Republican Light.. I am Republican and disagree with my fellow Republicans on this issue. We all need to compromise in order to get things done. I feel if someone is on the no fly list or being investigated by the FBI for terrorist activities they should be banned from buying guns legally. I am sure they will still get whatever is their weapon of choice, but not legally.
If someone is a law abiding citizen and not planning on doing anything to get themselves on the no fly list or investigated by the FBI, than they are golden and they get their gun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:52 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,988,674 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What part of "watch list" is it that makes you believe everyone on it is not a law abiding citizen?

Or would you just like to see a wholesale suspension of due-process?
If someone is put on a "watch list" for a technical error they will be removed and erased. If they are put because of something they did to raise suspicion, well then no gun will be sold to them legally. Is that really so bad?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2016, 11:53 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 5,310,580 times
Reputation: 11477
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What part of "watch list" is it that makes you believe everyone on it is not a law abiding citizen?

Or would you just like to see a wholesale suspension of due-process?
If someone made it to a watch list, that IMO provides enough doubt to take them out of the law abiding citizen category. Something got them there, and until they are taken off, can't purchase.

No different that an IRS lien. Don't pay or file taxes, ultimately you could have a lien placed on you. Unless you enter into a payment agreement, file and/or pay your taxes, that burden will be with you affecting your ability to conduct business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top