Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's what Republicans said in 2012 with Romney. They SWORE that Obama was going to be a single term president and it didn't even come close to turning out that way and the state polling was 100% correct.
That will still result in a victory for Hillary in Arizona though.
I wouldn't bet on it. If Hillary wins the best she can likely hope for is Obama 2008 without Indiana. My guess is it would likely be Obama 2012 without Iowa and New Hampshire though, and maybe win North Carolina.
I wouldn't bet on it. If Hillary wins the best she can likely hope for is Obama 2008 without Indiana. My guess is it would likely be Obama 2012 without Iowa and New Hampshire though, and maybe win North Carolina.
I think it's going to be Obama 2012 + Arizona + North Carolina - Nevada
As far as July poll numbers go I would imagine that Presidents Carter and GHW Bush have opinions on how those numbers helped form their 2nd terms as well as Presidents Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry (and if he were alive President McGovern) could opine on their respective administrations.
Polls are a complete sham. Trump proved that this year. If you wanna believe in them and Santa Claus that's your right.
I cannot dismiss the polls as easily as you.
I've read posts like yours back in 2004, 2008, 2012. Guess what ???!!! The pollsters were almost always right with an undeniable degree of precision and accuracy.
Corporations, businesses, political parties, candidates all spend hundreds of millions of dollars on pollsters ... if the polls were not accurate no one would waste such fortunes on them.
Folks - whether Republican or Democrat - denounce the polls when they reveal bad news for their candidate, but cheer them and praise them when they indicate their guy is ahead.
Actually polls have been pretty accurate this election season so far. They were within margin of error in the primaries. The fact that Hillary is leading into states such as Arizona and North Carolina really shows how bad of a candidate Donald Trump is. Hillary should not be leading in states like that. Even in Texas, the polls are in single digits between the two.
I've read posts like yours back in 2004, 2008, 2012. Guess what ???!!! The pollsters were almost always right with an undeniable degree of precision and accuracy.
Corporations, businesses, political parties, candidates all spend hundreds of millions of dollars on pollsters ... if the polls were not accurate no one would waste such fortunes on them.
Folks - whether Republican or Democrat - denounce the polls when they reveal bad news for their candidate, but cheer them and praise them when they indicate their guy is ahead.
That's the truth.
Pretty much this. Although, there are some pollsters you can discount due to their history of inaccuracy. Rasmussen, ARG, Gravis, Democracy Copy to name a few.
I've read posts like yours back in 2004, 2008, 2012. Guess what ???!!! The pollsters were almost always right with an undeniable degree of precision and accuracy.
Corporations, businesses, political parties, candidates all spend hundreds of millions of dollars on pollsters ... if the polls were not accurate no one would waste such fortunes on them.
Folks - whether Republican or Democrat - denounce the polls when they reveal bad news for their candidate, but cheer them and praise them when they indicate their guy is ahead.
That's the truth.
LMAO! Exactly! Except for me...I honestly look at polls objectively. I may be a Hillary supporter, but if the polls showed Trump winning the general election, I would absolutely ADMIT IT!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.