Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Does the fact that she was careless with classified information is it a factor in voting for her?
Yes I might not vote for Hilleary because of this 19 55.88%
No I will still vote for Hillary 15 44.12%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2016, 07:29 PM
 
13,629 posts, read 7,585,305 times
Reputation: 10320

Advertisements

I wanted to know how many would change their vote for her on what Comfey said. You die hard left wings are going to vote for her no matter what like a poster said she would have to murder someone to not get your vote. I have no problem with you always voting dem no matter what. You alone can't get Clinton in the white house many people who vote independent have to also vote for her. You might think Trump has no chance to win but your blinded by your extreme devotion to your party. I think it's a fair poll question to ask if this is going to influence your vote.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
There is no significant evidence that Clinton was in any way careless. Having a personal server for that job she has admitted was dumb. And if you wish to vote against her for having made a dumb mistake that is your right.

Comfey neither has nor claims the ability to determine that Clinton had anything classified on her machine. The only instance cited is a hair splitter...someone apparently incorrectly marked a piece of her daily schedule as classified. If you listen to Comfey you would know he is very careful to qualify this one as he knows it is not really a significant deviation.

The other stuff is clearly the attempt by some other agency to claim original discussion by Clinton and staff violated classified space. However the matters are so classified that they cannot be discussed.

Comfey is in no way qualified to determine or discuss such matters and should be censured for talking outside his job description and his personal knowledge.
Your angry over the commit that Comfey made "Extremely careless" because you think it will have an affect on her vote like I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2016, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,057 posts, read 10,476,006 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
I wanted to know how many would change their vote for her on what Comfey said. You die hard left wings are going to vote for her no matter what like a poster said she would have to murder someone to not get your vote. I have no problem with you always voting dem no matter what. You alone can't get Clinton in the white house many people who vote independent have to also vote for her. You might think Trump has no chance to win but your blinded by your extreme devotion to your party. I think it's a fair poll question to ask if this is going to influence your vote.




Your angry over the commit that Comfey made "Extremely careless" because you think it will have an affect on her vote like I do.
I certainlyh would never vote for an obvious charlatan such as Trump. But I am not a particular fan of Clinton...strictly a less of the evils vote in my mind.

But that in no way changes the fact that Comfey offered an opinion of a very damaging sort where he had no duty or even right to do so. And he has no expertise in the matter.

So what do you say when the State Dept investigates and says no significant classified material was involved? You can I suppose fire Comfey. But how does that square the damage done to Clinton. Or state says well there was one thing that should not have been there sent by a staffer...again how do you put that into context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2016, 11:20 PM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,935,175 times
Reputation: 6715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
I recognize political theater when I see it. The email revelations have absolutely no bearing on her ability to perform the duties of the President.
Bottom line: there's only one qualified choice this year, and Donald J Trump is that person.
True, even without the email scandals, crooked hillary is totally unqualified to be elected president. She has been a total failure at everything she has ever done in holding different offices. She is an evil woman who should be in jail, and would be if not for a corrupt system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2016, 11:21 PM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,935,175 times
Reputation: 6715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
This is really pretty inconsequential. Even Colin Powell has agreed that the directives didn't use to be that stringent, and this was no big deal. There was no deliberate wrongdoing. And as far as I've heard, nothing bad has resulted.
That is absolutely NOT TRUE..! Powell never said any such thing, you must be related to crooked hillary...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2016, 11:23 PM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,935,175 times
Reputation: 6715
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
There is no significant evidence that Clinton was in any way careless. Having a personal server for that job she has admitted was dumb. And if you wish to vote against her for having made a dumb mistake that is your right.

Comfey neither has nor claims the ability to determine that Clinton had anything classified on her machine. The only instance cited is a hair splitter...someone apparently incorrectly marked a piece of her daily schedule as classified. If you listen to Comfey you would know he is very careful to qualify this one as he knows it is not really a significant deviation.

The other stuff is clearly the attempt by some other agency to claim original discussion by Clinton and staff violated classified space. However the matters are so classified that they cannot be discussed.

Comfey is in no way qualified to determine or discuss such matters and should be censured for talking outside his job description and his personal knowledge.
What a bunch of BS..!
You can't fix stupid...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2016, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,057 posts, read 10,476,006 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man View Post
What a bunch of BS..!
You can't fix stupid...
Perhaps you should try a responsive post. Help you with your condition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top