For your reading pleasure, just a few of the Wikileaks DNC emails (voting, ethics)

[Lovetosave]

Originally Posted by mike1003

DNC member killing horses for insurance money.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/578

DNC making fun of black womans name.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC telling each other, "I love you too. no homo."

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/425

DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107

DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450

DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776

DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a "rigged system."

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806

DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin's office.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867

DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5304

DNC discussing Hillary's policies as unfeasible.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/519

$200k for a private dinner with Hillary.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17287

Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366

Faking outrage and pasting in a video later.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

A mole working inside of the Sanders campaign.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7793

Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508

Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6230

Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4077

Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

Hillary funding 2 million dollars in a cooridanted campaign in battleground states to win back the Senate.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7784

DNC is upset that their "allies" didn't send in protestors so they sent out interns.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366

"Clinton Foundation quid-pro-quo worries are lingering, will be exploited in general."

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

$50,000 - Lawrence Benenson.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/14700

Daily Fundraising Report for the DNC.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2875

Content & Social Strategy Discussion.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7512

Re: BuzzFeed and DNC connection.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10933

Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7586

Fwd: State Dinner Countdown.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/1901

Some chick is angry she hasn't been given more stuff from the Obama administration...might be interesting to follow up.

Re: State Dinner Countdown.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2946

Tim O'Brien: Trump's Fixation on Inflating his Net Worth is a Cause for Concern.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4496

RE: May Fundraising Numbers.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5615

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7720

Hillary for America Raised $26.4 Million in April, Began May with More than $30 Million Cash on Hand.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13986

Re: For approval: Trump supporter graphics. https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/788

Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016. More of a smoking gun than the ambiguous talk in the emails themselves.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/fileid/5254/2728

Consultant calling megyn kelly a bimbo. Has PDF attached that says the same.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6087

DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20148

Democrats using interns to organize fake "protests."

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13830

RE: Action on DNC tomorrow (Immigration Raids).

https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9736

Media is against Hillary and she is still winning.

Nice try though.

[lisanicole1]

Originally Posted by Lovetosave

Media is against Hillary and she is still winning.

Nice try though.

Is this a joke?

[chadgates]

Originally Posted by lisanicole1

Is this a joke?

From a different planet I suppose. THEIR media is against Hillary.

[saltine]

Caught with their hands in the cookie jar and now claim its standard practice. What will their defense be for Hilliarys arming Isis? most certainly they will excuse that too Sad days for America. Wtf did these crooked lefties come from?

[Marlow]

Originally Posted by lisanicole1

these emails were not from Hillary's campaign they were DNC emails (who were "supposed" to be neutral)

Yes. I know. They show bad judgment on the part of DNC staffers, and a lack of neutrality. But still, they don't exactly rise to the level of corruption.

I think most organizations would be embarrassed if their internal emails were made public. That's where people are most likely to be snarky and try to be funny. Then they put on their professional face when the deal with the public. But it doesn't mean that they're seething with corruption.

[mike1003]

1) It got rid of Debbi Wasserman-Shulz (and now 3 more DNC members)

And 2) MUCH MORE TO COME according to Wikileaks

[Marlow]

Originally Posted by Marlow

Yes. I know. They show bad judgment on the part of DNC staffers, and a lack of neutrality. But still, they don't exactly rise to the level of corruption.

I think most organizations would be embarrassed if their internal emails were made public. That's where people are most likely to be snarky and try to be funny. Then they put on their professional face when the deal with the public. But it doesn't mean that they're seething with corruption.

Quoting myself, which I know is dumb but:

An example of what I'm talking about. I'm on a committee to plan an event at my daughter's school. As soon as I got the first email, I wrote to the chair of the committee who is a friend and said "please put me on a committee with you, X or Y, because you're the only people in the whole group I like." The chair replied, "Don't worry. I feel your pain."

Would I be embarrassed if these emails were made public? Yes. Will I be friendly to the people I don't like if we end up working together? Of course.

At work, a co-worker meant to message me a very tacky comment about another employee. But she accidentally sent it to the employee. Ooops. It was embarrassing but they continued to work together just fine.

These emails are embarrassing but hardly show a smoking gun.

[JAMS14]

Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx

Do you also think it is funny when liberals start questioning the DNC and stop supporting their nominations? The fact that some Democrats seem to just accept this kind of behavior with the DNC is just sad but also explains how we have fallen so far into such a corrupt political system.

These are internal emails between people planning a political campaign. There is nothing nefarious about any of it. I guarantee the RNC internal emails would look very similar, as would the internal mail of every campaign of every political party going back 200 years.

This is absolutely nothing new. But judging from the histrionics on this thread, one would think every political campaign before this one just happened spontaneously with no behind the scenes planning.

[Cliftonpdx]

Originally Posted by JAMS14

These are internal emails between people planning a political campaign. There is nothing nefarious about any of it. I guarantee the RNC internal emails would look very similar, as would the internal mail of every campaign of every political party going back 200 years.

This is absolutely nothing new. But judging from the histrionics on this thread, one would think every political campaign before this one just happened spontaneously with no behind the scenes planning.

So the DNC was planning their Hillary campaign? That makes sense since the entire DNC was rigged so that Hillary was the nominee no matter what. What was the point of even having a primary? The DNC had already selected Hillary to be the nominee....do you not see the issue with this? It is as if some Democrats are so use to corruption that they think it is an acceptable way to run a party.

I am sure the RNC emails would look similar, that still doesn't make it okay. This is why I am saying BOTH parties have shown an extreme level of corruption that people seem to just accept. And emails haven't been going around for the past 200 years or we would be able to follow a paper trail that reflects this level of corruption.

[Dbones]

Originally Posted by MetroWord

Haha, I read about half of them before I started questioning myself what exactly is so bad about these? These emails are very typical behind the scene strategizing conversations.

There's that phrase again, yup, it was sent to them to disseminate out from the DNC (who employs these people with SuperPAC money) for damage control.