Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Originally Posted by NewbieHere
Why don't you waste your time worrying about money Hilary and Obama shipped to Iran so they can build nuclear weapons to nuke USA?
Thanks for confirming that your claim is just a waste of time.
Yeah, it's always the fault of the media. Poor picked on Donald; nothing can never be his fault. It is sort of like he and his loyal followers are hunkered down in the bunker together, telling each other not to worry, they can still pull this out.
That's not what they're telling each other anymore. They're now telling each other the election is rigged and Clinton's victory was inevitable for reasons other than it's what the majority of Americans want.
I would say unbelievable, but
1) this is Donald Drumpf
2) look at the posts on this board... so many people who believe in him and dismiss any evidence contrary to the position that he is our nation's savior
I dunno, I'm just going to vote straight Democrat this year as a means of flipping the bird to the Republican party for nominating a dingbat like him.
Just a heads up....there are now "low yield" nukes that are much more precise in targeting relatively small areas without having to have a large destruction area of conventional nukes...
"We" have spent considerable money on developing these low yield nukes for future conflicts so that we wouldn't have to have large scale collateral damage...
So we could nuke terrorist areas without obliterating large areas of the host countries...
So you agree with Trump? We should use nuclear weapons "because we have them?"
Our nuclear weapons ARE used EVERY DAY to keep the peace. No one said anything about setting one off. The reason the Russians invaded the Crimea was that Barack took their nukes away and promised that WE would protect them. Another limp-wristed Obama lie.
Just a heads up....there are now "low yield" nukes that are much more precise in targeting relatively small areas without having to have a large destruction area of conventional nukes...
"We" have spent considerable money on developing these low yield nukes for future conflicts so that we wouldn't have to have large scale collateral damage...
So we could nuke terrorist areas without obliterating large areas of the host countries...
The I should re-phrase an earlier statement in the thread to be updated as...
trump would low yield nuke if he thought they sent him a mean tweet
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump Kept asking briefer "Why Can't We Use Nucleur Weapons?"
