Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'll take "losers" over either of the other two manical, psychopathic, self interested, compulsive liars any day. If Clinton and Trump could reverse course on those deal breakers maybe we wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world for debating how on earth one of those two clowns should have the privilege of leading our country.
Johnson/Weld are the opposite of those other two extreme, self interested terrible options.
Unfortunately I am so opposed to Donald J. Trump, that I have no choice but to hold my nose and vote for evil Hillary. With the polling in Georgia tied at 46%, I feel impelled to. You know the (R) nominee sucks when we're in play, but how great would it be to flip Georgia blue? Pretty embarrassing for the Donald to be sure.
If you believe it to be great to turn the state blue you were never going to vote for the GOP candidate no matter who it was.
If you believe it to be great to turn the state blue you were never going to vote for the GOP candidate no matter who it was.
Not true, Trump is just that bad. I have voted for a Republican in every presidential election since 2000. I can't stand Hillary Clinton, but I'll take a rational criminal over an irrational madman.
I would love to see Georgia turn blue in this election just for the amount of embarrassment it would cause Donald J. Trump.
Stressed because you don't want Hillary leading another overthrow of a Middle East leader, resulting in more ISIS rule? Or maybe you don't like the thought of Donald Trump with his finger on the red button - it doesn't always have to be a 'D' or 'R' - maybe it's time for an 'L'.
Because the Libertarians have the definitive, detailed answer to solving the Middle East problem and defeating ISIS? Link, please?
It would help if you understood the process. They only have to win about 50 electoral votes. As long as they can keep The Hildabeast from getting to 270, they will win. Well, Johnson will; Weld probably won't.
Like I said, it would help if you understood the process.
Weld would not. If Johnson were elected by the House, the VP would be either Pence or Kaine. So it would be Johnson/Pence
I haven't been a big Libertarian fan, but I was very impressed with Johnson and Weld
last night on CNN's townhall.
I agreed with most of their policies, and they were very knowledgable and competent.
Both were highly successful republican governors.
I won't vote for either Trump or Hillary --- Johnson and Weld are worth taking a deeper look at. Even if they can't win, it sends a message to the other two parties.
I really hope they make it to the debates, so more voters can get a chance to hear them.
I'll take "losers" over either of the other two manical, psychopathic, self interested, compulsive liars any day. If Clinton and Trump could reverse course on those deal breakers maybe we wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world for debating how on earth one of those two clowns should have the privilege of leading our country.
Johnson/Weld are the opposite of those other two extreme, self interested terrible options.
Somebody needs to vote for Johnson/Weld.
Might as well be you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
