Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:17 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
Johnson is polling at an average of 8% right now. How exactly is he going to win any states at all? At best, he affects the percentages between Hillary and Donald, and to the extent that is happening, he seems to be taking away voters from Trump.
Not according to Politico and their polls.

Clinton's third-party headache - POLITICO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
3,040 posts, read 5,002,363 times
Reputation: 3422
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Johnson does not have the reputation as a liar. Quite the opposite. He can be truthful to a fault.

I'll relay this story again. I saw him at the WV (L) Convention. He was asked about his statements concerning smoking pot. The gist of the question went......"You have admitted to smoking pot. I don't know when this was but since you have admitted to breaking laws how can I trust you to uphold other laws".

He said something along the lines of "well, that would be about two weeks ago............"

Very few would be that honest.
Correct, and if you all desire to see what the people of New Mexico thought of him a their governor you can read some of their comment here: https://np.reddit.com/r/NewMexico/co...n_as_governor/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,215,171 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
I can't believe so many people here are against including Johnson in the "debates".

This is the c-d forum, right? where so many people rail against the "republicrats"? where everyone is talking about whose candidate has more unfavorable ratings? where so many people complain that the nomination was stolen from Sanders? where so many people are railing about both of the major party establishments? Where so many people are convinced that the election are rigged?

Sheesh. We need MORE ideas in the presidential campaign, not fewer! How do you expect that to happen if you don't take third-party candidates seriously enough to give them a public platform to go to head-to-head with the Big Two candidates??????

Personally, I'd lower the bar for participating in the "debates" to 5%.
I'm not personally against him being in the debates, but I think the 15% threshold is reasonable. I would possibly even support it going down to 10%. Below that, I think you end up with too many people in the debates - not as bad as the 17 seat clown car, but there are a limited number of general election debates, and I want to hear from the people who have some reasonable chance to be president, and not be distracted by a sideshow with candidates who aren't going to get elected and haven't earned the right to have that platform.

Alternatively, I'd say getting on the ballot in all 50 states might be another reasonable way to determine eligibility, which would put Johnson in there too.

What I don't think should happen is changing the standards along the way and making it up was we go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:19 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevek64 View Post
And trump admitted he bought off politicians for influence. That's also bluntly honest. I never heard any other politician admit something so bluntly. Do you therefore believe everything else that he says?

In the end, Johnson is a politican. That's all we need to know.
When you can post where he lies your post is worthless as an argument. Just because you support a habitual liar does not mean all politicians are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:20 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Not if they take a gander at the libertarian platform OR watch their convention on television.
The convention where everyone was allowed their say? Where no one walked out? Where no one protested by placing tape over their mouths or had their signs taken from them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post

Alternatively, I'd say getting on the ballot in all 50 states might be another reasonable way to determine eligibility, which would put Johnson in there too.
I think you're right, getting on the ballot in 50 states is a better standard than a percentage.


Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
What I don't think should happen is changing the standards along the way and making it up was we go.
Why not? The "debates" are sponsored by private organizations, they can change their standards if they want.

Although I will say I thought they were better when the League of Women Voters sponsored them. Better and more thoughtful questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Amongst the AZ Cactus
7,068 posts, read 6,470,276 times
Reputation: 7730
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
When you can post where he lies your post is worthless as an argument. Just because you support a habitual liar does not mean all politicians are.
Non-sequitur.

I don't "support" any politician.

As for a "habitual liar", coming from a clinton supporter, you made me lol on that one!

Most recent one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...were-truthful/

Washington Post Just Gave Hillary Four Pinocchios - Fox Nation

As for "Just because you support a habitual liar does not mean all politicians are."

Now I'm not sure if I should keep laughing at the bolded statement or get frightened that you truly feel there are politicians out there who don't lie and do it often. You're not serious, are you? You state such a thing on a public forum? *Yikes*.

oh, and sander's got a fair shake in the primary says the party of no lies/we were told this for months....hey, "wiki" wait a minute there!

Oh, the entertainment factor here is high today!

Last edited by stevek64; 08-05-2016 at 01:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:35 PM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,886,902 times
Reputation: 2460
Why are we even talking about these third party candidates. They should of run on the DNC Ticket when they had the chance.


A little too late and even if they put on the ballet it would not go far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,900 posts, read 3,901,723 times
Reputation: 5857
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
Why are we even talking about these third party candidates.
Because people want to hear other voices from someone other than two habitual liars in Trump and Hillary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
They should of run on the DNC Ticket when they had the chance.
Laughable. Gary is no Democrat, he even ran as a Republican in the 2011 primaries. And Bill Weld was a very successful Republican governor. I can see the Trump supporters are gathering their list of excuses to use after Trump loses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 04:06 PM
 
4,668 posts, read 3,900,630 times
Reputation: 3437
Johnson/Weld have in just the last week polled at 12%, 10%, and 10%. The debate commission has stated if they are in the margin of error, they will consider putting him in the debate, despite not technically at 15%. The margin of error on these polls is 3%+/-. So technically he already meets what they stated in one poll. I believe it has to be 3 polls that meet their requirements within a months time. So Johnson is theoretically close.






His rolling average (while important) on the RCP doesn't matter, it's his 3 best polls have to match the debate commissions requirements, and he's not that far off.


If the debate commission is making statements on Johnson, then they are already watching him and considering letting him debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top