Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So basically the Secretary of Lies didn't think conversations about drone attacks were worth keeping secret.
Quote:
The U.S. treats drone operations conducted by the CIA as classified
Quote:
The FBI interview also seems to confirm that some of the emails in question dealt with U.S. drone strikes.
When discussing a redacted email, for example, Clinton “stated deliberation over a future drone strike did not give her cause for concern regarding classification,” and Clinton “understood this type of conversation as part of the routine deliberation process.”
So basically the Secretary of Lies didn't think conversations about drone attacks were worth keeping secret.
Remember that Comey said that Hillary would have known that the material she was discussing in her emails were classified, and that a private email is no place for such conversations.
It was her job to know what she was and was not allowed to do and she is lying about that anyway since Bill Clinton gave a pardon to someone that mishandled classified email: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_M._Deutch so Hillary figured she could get the same from Obama if need be. That she couldn't tell a sensitive document from one that wasn't would show gross incompetence on her part.
You can go over this with as fine toothed a comb as you want. The only thing that will do is further conspiracy theories. As for action, hasn't the FBI already decided they will take no actions?
I look forward to the thousands of pointless debates on this subject. As far as this election cycle is concerned, it will join Benghazi as talking point for those who hate Clinton and another ignore point for those who do not.
You can go over this with as fine toothed a comb as you want. The only thing that will do is further conspiracy theories. As for action, hasn't the FBI already decided they will take no actions?
I look forward to the thousands of pointless debates on this subject. As far as this election cycle is concerned, it will join Benghazi as talking point for those who hate Clinton and another ignore point for those who do not.
Yes, but the undecideds might be swayed one way or another. I say, keep up the chatter.
You can go over this with as fine toothed a comb as you want. The only thing that will do is further conspiracy theories. As for action, hasn't the FBI already decided they will take no actions?
I look forward to the thousands of pointless debates on this subject. As far as this election cycle is concerned, it will join Benghazi as talking point for those who hate Clinton and another ignore point for those who do not.
So you are good with a POTUS who we now know "frequently lost" devices with top secret information on them?
So you are good with a POTUS who we now know "frequently lost" devices with top secret information on them?
Yes. That is what he is saying. But that shouldn't surprise you. She can do whatever she wants and as long as she uses slippery language, and the aid of her political allies, her minions will just minimize it and laugh it off.
That she couldn't tell a sensitive document from one that wasn't would show gross incompetence on her part.
This is what concerns me most.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
