Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She only used 1 device at a time. Her reason for mixing work email with personal email was so she wouldn't need to use 2 devices at the same time- 1 for work email and the other for personal email. It was a bad choice to merge work and personal emails, and she has admitted this was a bad choice. But her reasoning for using 1 device (at a time) is a an understandable issue. It's a hassle to always have 2 devices(personal and work), always have them charged and on your person. She was trying to streamline and only have 1 device to deal with. A bad choice, and even thought it's a hassle to have 2 devices, it's still better to keep work and personal 100% separate.
When upgrading an old device for a new device, she still only used 1 device that got both personal emails and work emails on the same smartphone. She didn't use 13 devices at the same time. These were smartphone upgrades. The service switches to the new phone and is removed from the old phone each time.
Somehow the Rose Law Firm billing records magically appeared, in a box on top of the main table in the White House library .... two years after they were subpoenaed.
With Hillary's extensive history of criminal behavior, nothing has changed but the technology.....and the number of zeroes following the amounts she stole.
Don't forget that they appeared after the statute of limitations ran out.
She only used 1 device at a time. Her reason for mixing work email with personal email was so she wouldn't need to use 2 devices at the same time- 1 for work email and the other for personal email. It was a bad choice to merge work and personal emails, and she has admitted this was a bad choice. But her reasoning for using 1 device (at a time) is a an understandable issue. It's a hassle to always have 2 devices(personal and work), always have them charged and on your person. She was trying to streamline and only have 1 device to deal with. A bad choice, and even thought it's a hassle to have 2 devices, it's still better to keep work and personal 100% separate.
When upgrading an old device for a new device, she still only used 1 device that got both personal emails and work emails on the same smartphone. She didn't use 13 devices at the same time. These were smartphone upgrades. The service switches to the new phone and is removed from the old phone each time.
She only used 1 device at a time. Her reason for mixing work email with personal email was so she wouldn't need to use 2 devices at the same time- 1 for work email and the other for personal email. It was a bad choice to merge work and personal emails, and she has admitted this was a bad choice. But her reasoning for using 1 device (at a time) is a an understandable issue. It's a hassle to always have 2 devices(personal and work), always have them charged and on your person. She was trying to streamline and only have 1 device to deal with. A bad choice, and even thought it's a hassle to have 2 devices, it's still better to keep work and personal 100% separate.
When upgrading an old device for a new device, she still only used 1 device that got both personal emails and work emails on the same smartphone. She didn't use 13 devices at the same time. These were smartphone upgrades. The service switches to the new phone and is removed from the old phone each time.
When you defend her like this, do you feel dirty and like you need to shower immediately?
These weren't just upgrades, when she was upgrading, the "location of old devices devices would frequently become unknown." Do you understand that? She LOST devices with confidential information on them, and apparently never found some of them. She treated devices with confidential information on them as if they were last weeks news paper. If and when she did find them, she destroyed them with a hammer or snapped them in half.
Again, do you understand the nonsense that this is?
When she didn't give a flying f' about security, she just banged on something with a hammer or snapped them in half and tossed it in the garbage. This is in no way shape or form a way to guarantee that confidential information is destroyed. As soon as she realized the FBI was looking into her activities, she turned to BleachBit to absolutely, completely and permanently destroy any digital evidence.
The woman is as corrupt, dangerous, and dishonest as they get.
People that defend her are nothing more than a modern day Benedict Arnold.
Yes, she used 1 device at a time as in she probably wasn't simultaneously logged on to 2 devices at once, but she clearly interchangeably used multiple devices over her time as Secretary of State.
For example, she would use an iPad for classified email interchangeably with her phone.
Why are you lying for careless Hillary - do you hate your country or do you just love your party more than your country?
She only used 1 device at a time. Her reason for mixing work email with personal email was so she wouldn't need to use 2 devices at the same time- 1 for work email and the other for personal email. It was a bad choice to merge work and personal emails, and she has admitted this was a bad choice. But her reasoning for using 1 device (at a time) is a an understandable issue. It's a hassle to always have 2 devices(personal and work), always have them charged and on your person. She was trying to streamline and only have 1 device to deal with. A bad choice, and even thought it's a hassle to have 2 devices, it's still better to keep work and personal 100% separate.
When upgrading an old device for a new device, she still only used 1 device that got both personal emails and work emails on the same smartphone. She didn't use 13 devices at the same time. These were smartphone upgrades. The service switches to the new phone and is removed from the old phone each time.
I read every single one of the emails released in August, and what I found was someone who actually gave a damn about the country, the Democratic party, and all of our futures.
In those emails, I also found a woman who seemed to understand power and how to use it wisely. A woman of formidable intellect who actually understood the nuances of a thing, and how to strike a tough bargain.
Hillary claimed she only used 1 device for email, the FBI said she used at least 13 devices.
Hillary worked with classified info for over 10 years, but claims she couldn't recognize the classified markings.
Hillary claimed that she erred on the side of caution when deleting emails AFTER congress asked for them, but classified info was found within those deleted.
She misplaced cellphones with classified emails, she sent emails unencrypted over foreign telecoms in Russia, China, and other countries...
Etc...
What is the reason?
Is it because as close friend and personal assistant Huma says that Hillary is easily and often confused?
Or is Hillary lying to cover up her secrets while being carefree with national secrets?
What is the best excuse for her to still be president?
Well, first of all, anyone that believes Hillary when she says anything is a fool.
Didn't recognize the "C" for "classified". Well, from what I heard said, as SOS, she should have been able to recognize "sensitive" materials even if not marked. She was in a position where if she had a document that appeared sensitive, she should have been asking why it was not classified rather than just sending it out on unsecured networks.
Hillary knows she doesn't have to err on the side of caution. As we know, Bill Clinton gave a pardon based on mishandling of classified materials by a CIA Director: Bill Clinton's Pardon for Classified Documents | National Review I am sure that Hillary felt confident that Obama (like many others terrified of the Clinton Crime Family) would give here all the forgiveness necessary if she were caught.
The reason? Because she knew she could get a way with it. Let's show her she was wrong!
Karoli Kuns, a staunch liberal who shames Democrats crossing the divide with Republicans, just gave Hillary a free pass. I am as shocked as Wayland Woman is!
So anyways, do you think Hillary is an incompetent buffoon, a corrupt liar, or both?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
