Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's pretty thorough. There is also a link at the bottom to the FBI documents. Frankly, it's pretty astonishing how much she has been allowed to get away with.
Could you please answer honestly why?
Did you care before Obama was in office, or did all of these all newfound concerns about email start in 2009?
Very disingenuous, and that includes the biased witchhunters in Congress.
Where are all the 'concerned citizens' who didn't care one iota about millions, yes millions, of lost emails during the Bush admin?
"...Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails... "
Did you care before Obama was in office, or did all of these all newfound concerns about email start in 2009?
Very disingenuous, and that includes the biased witchhunters in Congress.
Where are all the 'concerned citizens' who didn't care one iota about millions, yes millions, of lost emails during the Bush admin?
"...Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails... "
The rules for handling classified info/use of electronic devices changed in 2009.
Bush's administration weren't under a subpoena to produce them, nor did they use bleachbit to destroy them.
Did you care before Obama was in office, or did all of these all newfound concerns about email start in 2009?
Very disingenuous, and that includes the biased witchhunters in Congress.
Where are all the 'concerned citizens' who didn't care one iota about millions, yes millions, of lost emails during the Bush admin?
"...Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails... "
I don't think Bush is running. We are actually discussing the current election for 2016 where Trump will be running against, well, we aren't sure, but he will be the GOP candidate. I realize for some this is confusing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spottednikes
The rules for handling classified info/use of electronic devices changed in 2009.
Bush's administration weren't under a subpoena to produce them, nor did they use bleachbit to destroy them.
Rules? They don't care about "rules" anyway. Still don't understand how people operating with so little knowledge would use bleachbit.
As I have stated before, a part of me hopes he wins so that you, on the other side, get what you are hoping for. I strongly suspect 6 months in you will be changing your minds when things start to go South.
Don
Please take that part of you to the polls and help it become a reality then.
I can't believe you admitted that you agree with my summary, even if I do know it is true. My question though...if you really feel that way about Hillary, why not vote for someone other than her or Trump? I certainly would not vote for a candidate that I believe to be horribly corrupt and disqualified.
Did you care before Obama was in office, or did all of these all newfound concerns about email start in 2009?
Very disingenuous, and that includes the biased witchhunters in Congress.
Where are all the 'concerned citizens' who didn't care one iota about millions, yes millions, of lost emails during the Bush admin?
"...Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails... "
Answer what? I still haven't gotten an answer from Hillary supporters as to whether or not (or why) they condone such actions.
I'm not sure what they want answered. I would guess that you are familiar with their being stumped if "lie or deflect" isn't within their reach.
My though is that we need to concentrate on candidates right now and their past. But, so and so did it? The election is about 3 or 4 candidates and in the "election" that is all that matters.
The detailed listing tells a story that many don't want told. We have gotten bites and pieces and each time they cry "Oh, that is just a minor thing." but they certainly do add up when you get the play-by-play.
It is the "sum" of that counts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would guess that you are familiar with their being stumped if "lie or deflect" isn't within their reach.
