Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Something the Dr's tell you when you or your children are put on an antibiotic is that after it's been in your system for 24 hrs you are no longer considered contagious.
So? Doctors are never wrong? Everyone's system is the same and reacts the same?
You don't err on the side of caution and say "I better stay away just in case I still am contagious"?
I realize her not attending the 9/11 service(especially being a former NY Senator) would have looked bad, but infecting other people isn't too good either.
Something the Dr's tell you when you or your children are put on an antibiotic is that after it's been in your system for 24 hrs you are no longer considered contagious.
I had bacterial pneumonia. I was told to avoid being around children, including my own children, for at least 10 days after starting antibiotics. Of course I had a different doctor than Mrs. Clinton.
But, if the antibiotics kick in after 24 hours and you're no longer contagious, doesn't that also mean that at 48 hours you should be starting to feel a little better, and not fainting or unable to walk?
How long does it take to rehydrate a person? Do you know? I think they administer fluids via IV, which gets you going pretty fast.
Did Chelsea administer the IV?
You realize that it is a slow drip don't you beside the claim that she has pneumonia?
Hydration alone dies not make everything OK with such a patient.
All her supporters here are claiming she hit no medical attention.
I realize her not attending the 9/11 service(especially being a former NY Senator) would have looked bad, but infecting other people isn't too good either.
Actually, she would have looked a lot better sitting out the 9/11 service. She didn't have to say she had pneumonia. She could have just said she had a cold or bronchitis and was going to spend the day resting before her trip to California. I don't think anyone would have really noticed that.
But boy-oh-boy do people notice a presidential candidate collapsing and being lifted into a van.
Actually, she would have looked a lot better sitting out the 9/11 service. She didn't have to say she had pneumonia. She could have just said she had a cold or bronchitis and was going to spend the day resting before her trip to California. I don't think anyone would have really noticed that.
But boy-oh-boy do people notice a presidential candidate collapsing and being lifted into a van.
I agree. Sitting out might have dinged her fractionally for a few days, but collapsing in grand fashion takes the race into a completely different direction.
Actually, she would have looked a lot better sitting out the 9/11 service. She didn't have to say she had pneumonia. She could have just said she had a cold or bronchitis and was going to spend the day resting before her trip to California. I don't think anyone would have really noticed that.
But boy-oh-boy do people notice a presidential candidate collapsing and being lifted into a van.
She was often drunk while flying around the world as Sec of State..
I really dislike Hillary but I voted NO because we have a HIPPA "law of the land" that grants us some privacy rights.
For me to condone her being OUTSIDE the protection of our laws would mean that I had sunk to her level of being ABOVE the laws so I had to vote NO.
The question was "Should HILLARY release them?" not "Should her medical records be forcibly revealed r leaked"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.