Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Former Clinton CIA head joins Trump team, slams Hillary
"James Woolsey, who headed the CIA during the early years of the Bill Clinton administration, is making no secret of his opposition to another Clinton occupying the White House."
"Since Secretary Clinton left the State Department we have learned that she demonstrated a complete lack of understanding and an inability to lead the agency she headed in such a way as to maintain its mission and security," Woolsey said in the statement. "Based on the emails thus far released we know that Secretary Clinton also lacks the ability to lead her senior managers while complying with and maintaining the basic protocols designed to protect our government’s sensitive and classified information."
"Since Secretary Clinton left the State Department we have learned that she demonstrated a complete lack of understanding and an inability to lead the agency she headed in such a way as to maintain its mission and security," Woolsey said in the statement. "Based on the emails thus far released we know that Secretary Clinton also lacks the ability to lead her senior managers while complying with and maintaining the basic protocols designed to protect our government’s sensitive and classified information."
"Woolsey served as Clinton's head of the CIA for two years, from 1993-1995. He complained about having little to no access to the president during his time at the head of the agency, according to The Wall Street Journal."
"Woolsey served as Clinton's head of the CIA for two years, from 1993-1995. He complained about having little to no access to the president during his time at the head of the agency, according to The Wall Street Journal."
Not sure on the grudge/this/that/the other thing but he makes logical sense on the "why". She was an SS who claimed to not know what "C" means to mark classified/confidential documents and thought it was some alphabetizing scheme.
That to me is beyond disqualifying for SS let alone becoming president making such a statement. From an SS! To me an SS claiming not to know what "C" means is like a surgeon saying they don't know what a scalpel is.
If that was a lie and she did know what "C" meant as assange says she did with proof to show it......
That proves to me she can't be trusted/lies. Non-presidential material. So that makes woosley's a logical endorsement, based on the reality that he feels based on facts/her performance, that she is inept for a job.
Who really gives a crap who the CIA backs. They are the Obama establishment, and are the "Lapdogs" of Obama and Hillary. Government Agencies are part of the problem and not part of the solution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Another One Joins The Trumpster
