Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you have any idea how depth of field works? Apparently not, it's a harvest moon, though, I understand.
The people with their cellphones are not anywhere near as close to the stage/podium as they appear in the video. Here's a wide-angle shot of the front of the venue, the stage/podium is in front of the large flag on the left: https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=640&h=353
(please notice the URL, I picked an image from a rightwing site so as to dampen any further tinfoil notions of hanky-panky)
Compare that shot with what you see on the cellphones and it's obvious the folks with cellphones are some distance back from the podium and are capturing the balcony, swags, and the blue sign to the right of the podium & large flag.
Thread fail.
Post fail. Trying to pull the wool of obfuscation over everyone's eyes. Depth of field and then the arrogance to suggest nobody understands it.
The phones are no more than 20 feet from Hillary. In one camera, as she passes by with nothing between her and the camera lens, we do not see her pass by. Plain to see.
Maybe Hillary supporters at her rallies are watching a movie on their phones or some family album pics. Then saying they were recording Hillary if one of the HRC campaign people come around.
Either way, Hillary is not inspiring much enthusiasm among her supporters.
The phones are no more than 20 feet from Hillary. In one camera, as she passes by with nothing between her and the camera lens, we do not see her pass by. Plain to see.
Not sure how you know they're within 20 feet but I'll go with that. Even 15-20 feet is ample distance to capture the balcony and swags and sign that, if you looked at the image I linked, are right there where the cellphones are aimed.
But<shrug>, whatever cuckoo theory rings your bell, have at it. If you're not chasing this one, you'll be chasing the next one.
Do you have any idea how depth of field works? Apparently not, it's a harvest moon, though, I understand.
The people with their cellphones are not anywhere near as close to the stage/podium as they appear in the video. Here's a wide-angle shot of the front of the venue, the stage/podium is in front of the large flag on the left: https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=640&h=353
(please notice the URL, I picked an image from a rightwing site so as to dampen any further tinfoil notions of hanky-panky)
Compare that shot with what you see on the cellphones and it's obvious the folks with cellphones are some distance back from the podium and are capturing the balcony, swags, and the blue sign to the right of the podium & large flag.
Thread fail.
I'm familiar with photography, you are wrong.
The cameras are not showing what is in front of the cameras.
All the cameras are clearly in selfie mode.
How is it possible that all of the cameras were in selfie mode, and none of the people noticed.
This just isn't plausible. Now add the fact that this has happened at least twice, at two different Hillary rallies.
This just went from not plausible, to highly unlikely.
I don't know what is going on, and I have no explanation.
However, if the crowd is being added in through video editing, that would explain why every camera is in selfie mode, because you could not have the phones showing a green screen, or an empty stage with no Hillary.
Even after I explained this, folks are still buying into it. I guess I'd better buy some stock in tinfoil. Harvest moon or not, there's bound to be a shortage..
Well, I have no idea about this. What I am noticing is the level of shrillness and expert testimony have both increased, dramatically, from the Clinton camp.
Disdain, denigration, expert testimony about videography, internal medicine.... You name it.
Right now polls are distressing to the left. If they turn in a weeks time, probably no worries for Mrs Clinton come election day. The preceding observation courtesy Nate Silver, 538. If the polls do not turn in a week, ugh oh. That also from Mr Silver.
Which might explain the panic-sounding shrillness.
Well, I have no idea about this. What I am noticing is the level of shrillness and expert testimony have both increased, dramatically, from the Clinton camp.
Disdain, denigration, expert testimony about videography, internal medicine.... You name it.
Right now polls are distressing to the left. If they turn in a weeks time, probably no worries for Mrs Clinton come election day. The preceding observation courtesy Nate Silver, 538. If the polls do not turn in a week, ugh oh. That also from Mr Silver.
Which might explain the panic-sounding shrillness.
Trump or Hillary fans: NO "counting the chickens till they hatch"; this election IMHO will keep swinging back and forth till the end.
Hardly counting chickens Packers. Related Nate Silvers take I believe from Friday. Did offer my opinion on the why of increasingly shrill left voices. That is all
I really never knew we had so many crackpots out there that buy every conspiracy theory that comes down the pike.
yea reminds me of the left and their accusations of conspiracy theories when referring to Hillary's health. First they called everyone who questioned Hillary's Health a RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY THEORIST! Then they called everyone SEXIST!
On the Jimmy Kimmel show, Clinton called the GOP claims about her health a "wacky strategy."
Then CNN said Karl Rove helped plant the seeds in 2014
And then the right was proven right. Wow, Hillary made a fool of the liberal media.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.