U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:02 AM
 
10,276 posts, read 8,960,916 times
Reputation: 10644

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post


The only thing reckless around here is the liberals trying to spin that almight jab that Trump got on Clinton. She got BURNED and the liberals are mightily butthurt over that.
No one thinks this except for hardcore Breitbart types. No one.

In fact Trump proved Clinton's point. She had just said "Thank God you aren't in charge" and he responded "because you'd be in jail".

That was exactly her point. He's a dangerous fascist. He would jail political opponents. He would tear up the Constitution. He would ignore rule of law. The President has zero police/prosecution powers, but Trump doesn't care.
Rate this post positively

 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,964 posts, read 20,408,375 times
Reputation: 25751
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamies View Post
He didn't say HE'D jail her, just that she ought to BE in jail.

I thought it was a pretty good come back to her snippy comment.

I wish he'd of just goosed her as she left the stage.

Yeah. That would really help him with the female voters. Believe it or not - he needs them to win.


And, YES, he did say he would jail her.


Impotent Dictator is the title you are looking for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. In-Between View Post
You're talking way over their heads here, Ambient. Very few Trumpheads are intelligent enough to understand anything about he Constitution or the separation of powers, and even if they did they'd only consider it a trivial inconvenience.
Word.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:06 AM
 
2,313 posts, read 1,697,853 times
Reputation: 5285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Yeah. That would really help him with the female voters. Believe it or not - he needs them to win.


And, YES, he did say he would jail her.


Impotent Dictator is the title you are looking for.



Word.
If she broke the law (which she most certainly did in her handling of classified material), then she needs to be jailed no matter who becomes president. The fact that our current president and AG are in her back pocket (see Bill's meeting in the jet shortly before the release of the investigation's findings) doesn't change the fact that laws were broken.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:07 AM
 
69,364 posts, read 60,396,650 times
Reputation: 9375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Yeah. That would really help him with the female voters. Believe it or not - he needs them to win.

And, YES, he did say he would jail her.

Impotent Dictator is the title you are looking for.

Word.
So women voters dont believe criminals belong in jail? Who would have thought that?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:07 AM
 
2,313 posts, read 1,697,853 times
Reputation: 5285
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
No one thinks this except for hardcore Breitbart types. No one.

In fact Trump proved Clinton's point. She had just said "Thank God you aren't in charge" and he responded "because you'd be in jail".

That was exactly her point. He's a dangerous fascist. He would jail political opponents. He would tear up the Constitution. He would ignore rule of law. The President has zero police/prosecution powers, but Trump doesn't care.
He would jail those who break the law. He doesn't want to put Hillary in jail because she's his political opponent; he wants her in jail because she is a criminal.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:12 AM
 
Location: CT
3,459 posts, read 2,223,126 times
Reputation: 4635
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCresident2014 View Post
He would jail those who break the law. He doesn't want to put Hillary in jail because she's his political opponent; he wants her in jail because she is a criminal.
Then she would be protected by the Constitution, to have a right to a trial by a jury of her peers and not the court of opinion.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,070 posts, read 6,213,445 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Yep, Trump actually thinks that if he becomes President he will automatically be able to do any little thing he wants, all on his own. WRONG !! There is that pesky little thing called the Constitution and, also, he does not get to make all the decisions on his own. He will have a Senate and Congress to convince and a myriad of other obstacles to overcome before any of his "ideas" would become reality.

When he says really dumb stuff like "On day one half the illegals will be gone (I paraphrase slightly)" it shows how out of touch he really is and how little he knows about American laws and process. He does not get to just wave his magic wand and hundreds of his minions jump up and bow down to the chief. Maybe in Korea, but not in main street America.


Don
Trump's new quote will be

"When your president, they let you do whatever you want, you can grab the country by the (insert vulgar vagina word)

Don't underestimate his power if he wins which thank God is unlikely. His ignorance won't stop him. If he won he would indeed get away with destroying our country. Quite a few countries who have dictatorships has constitutions that protected its citizens. What they do is that once in power they changed it.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
27,375 posts, read 20,529,915 times
Reputation: 32723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
There are people in jail and kicked out of Service for LESS than what Hillary has done with Classified emails.
10 Times People Were Punished For FAR Less Than What Hillary Clinton Did

Quote:
Bill Clinton’s National Security Adviser guilty of Destroying Documents in National Archives: “Sandy Berger …

State Department Official Fired and Security Clearance Revoked After Linking to Classified Wikileaks Document: Peter Van Buren...

Bill Clinton’s CIA Director Was Pardoned During Plea Negotiations for Storing Classified Data on Home Computer: John Deutch...

Navy engineer sentenced for mishandling classified material: Bryan Nishimura...

Sailor Smuggles Classified Docs off Ship [Petty Officer 2nd Class Bryan Minkyu Martin]...

Low Level Submarine Shipmate Prosecuted for Less Serious Crime than Clinton: Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier...

Marine Corps. Major Caught Sending Classified Documents to Superiors Using Personal Email: Maj. Jason Brezler...

Lab Tech Steals Data from Nuclear Facility. Jessica Lynn Quintana...

NSA Manager gives Classified Info to Newspaper [Thomas A. Drake]...

State Dept. Official Steals Classified Docs: Donald Willis Keyser...
Hillary supporters are lying hypocrites.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
27,375 posts, read 20,529,915 times
Reputation: 32723
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
No one thinks this except for hardcore Breitbart types. No one.

In fact Trump proved Clinton's point. She had just said "Thank God you aren't in charge" and he responded "because you'd be in jail".

That was exactly her point. He's a dangerous fascist. He would jail political opponents. He would tear up the Constitution. He would ignore rule of law. The President has zero police/prosecution powers, but Trump doesn't care.
In your dream land. Everyone knows that was a burn...the anger and crying coming from Hillary supporters today also illustrate that they know it was a burn.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-10-2016, 09:28 AM
 
10,276 posts, read 8,960,916 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCresident2014 View Post
If she broke the law (which she most certainly did in her handling of classified material), then she needs to be jailed no matter who becomes president.
She did not break the law. That already has been determined by the relevant authorities (who are Republican, BTW).

Unless you have some "inside info", that ship has long since sailed.
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top