Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2016, 07:36 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,311,376 times
Reputation: 5565

Advertisements

Because this is what happens when you do this stuff too early and for too long. People get their fill of hearing about it and the stories begins to lose their impact. Also, the stuff is pretty tame and not worth reporting on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2016, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,747,743 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by wall st kid View Post
its called passion, something hillary supporters certainly lack. the passion to 'beat trump' is way higher than hoping hillary will win and remember this, you're not allowed to vote 'against' trump, there's no 'not donald trump' lever, so you'll have to actually vote FOR the crime boss....hopefully telling your children or your nephews and nieces wont be so hard when they ask why did you vote for someone who laughed at a young girl being raped and why did you vote for the wife that enabled her husband to rape women and then attacked those women's character after they spoke up.
As opposed to voting for the man that freely admitted that he himself sexually assaulted women and is still demeaning and insulting every woman that disagrees with him?

Please do explain how one is better than the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 07:41 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,119,956 times
Reputation: 6842
Because a lot of the media is just an extension of her campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 07:48 AM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,118,534 times
Reputation: 6136
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
As opposed to voting for the man that freely admitted that he himself sexually assaulted women and is still demeaning and insulting every woman that disagrees with him?

Please do explain how one is better than the other.
You can try to push that lie, but people know it isn't true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:05 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,587,441 times
Reputation: 25817
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
You can try to push that lie, but people know it isn't true.
Women are coming forward every day. Not to mention his pending lawsuits AND the victim he paid off.


Oh, and Miss Arizona just came forward and confirmed that Trump often walked back in the dressing room while the girls were naked.


JUST as he confirmed he did on Howard Stern's show. No other male was allowed backstage but since he was the owner . . . he could pretend he was doing an inspection.


The tape with Stern is out there.


Denial is not just a river in Egypt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,304,274 times
Reputation: 19953
Maybe because these illegal activities have been coordinated with shady Trump operatives? Now it appears to be intentional meddling in the US election. I have absolute contempt for Assange, Roger Stone and Russia. Seems like they are trying to manipulate us--and, frankly, they deserve to be ignored.

Nobody even knows which documents are real and which have been altered. Poor Assange--what will he do after the elections when he is even more irrelevant? Perhaps all of us are not willing to manipulated and played for fools by a fugitive sexual molester holed up in a foreign embassy, an ex-KGB operative and a sleazy political agent of Trump's.

This entire Russia/Wikileaks/Trump campaign threesome stinks to high heavens. It's many times worse than anything done in Watergate. Screw Putin--he manipulates his own media--why should he manipulate ours?

And now we hear from Donny--the little boy who has cried wolf and lied so often, nobody believes him any longer. He's thrown so much dirt and conspiracy theory nonsense out there that his newfound love of Wikileaks is actually tainting its influence. Toxic is as toxic does.

Trump Ally Roger Stone Claims to Be Colluding With Wikileaks to Torpedo Clinton

Clinton Adviser Podesta Connects Trump Campaign to WikiLeaks - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,747,743 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
You can try to push that lie, but people know it isn't true.
This "people" knows no such thing.

Either Trump did it and bragged about it, or he didn't do it and lied about having done it.

Which of these is defensible?

He has no more credibility than does Julian Assange.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
2,013 posts, read 1,434,034 times
Reputation: 4062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I think Infowars and Breitbart are great sources.
If you are making compost, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:43 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,119,956 times
Reputation: 6842
Wikileaks has a 100% accuracy rate. The documents may not bother you but that doesn't mean they are faje
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:52 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,225,377 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
Another example of the media's strategy to give people the runaround...simply make a story about Trump and Russia.
The question I have for the public, on either side, how can you possibly trust the media after what is being released?

1984 anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top