Which state do you predict will get Hillary over 270 when it is called for her on election night? (interview, liberal)

[TheDusty]

Originally Posted by dashrendar4454

threads like this are important and should be archived. It shows that many liberals were 100% wrong with all their predictions so why should we trust their predictions (Trump getting impeached being the main one. Also, him quitting) right now?

This is the opinion of one person, not liberals as a monolithic group. Why do you ask or expect liberals to sacrifice their individuality? Do you not believe in individuality?

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by Tall Traveler

I think about the only correct prediction in this thread.

There is sure a lot of crow the Dims on CD need to be gulping down for the next few years.

Hahah..thanks

[BobNJ1960]

Originally Posted by TheDusty

This is the opinion of one person, not liberals as a monolithic group. Why do you ask or expect liberals to sacrifice their individuality? Do you not believe in individuality?

We do. We're laughing at the individual who made this thread, and those who predicted which state would make HRC the 45th POTUS.

[nmnita]

Originally Posted by TxStorm72

My guess would be California at the top of the hour 11 PM EST.

Is it too late to vote? I think I have the answer: I think the answer is none of the above or below for that matter.

[armourereric]

The tiny Republic of Togo

[Nodpete]

The State of Denial !

[DoomDan515]

Idk. Every state was called and Hillary is only at 227.

[Matrix2791]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

My prediction:

This election will be called well before bedtime on Nov 8th.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FWLvoPNeN5c/maxresdefault.jpg

Could call!!!!!!!!! You hit the nail on the head!!!!!

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by TxStorm72

My guess would be California at the top of the hour 11 PM EST.

USA Founding fathers in their infinite wisdom created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet and it should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) don’t and shouldn’t speak for the rest of our country.

[Compression]

Originally Posted by Nodpete

The State of Denial !

And they're still waiting for those returns to make a difference, eight months later.


CN