Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2020, 06:30 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,151,227 times
Reputation: 8224

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matchroad View Post
The Hillary campaign never had wheels to begin with.
Regardless of the silly "wheels" metaphor - let's not forget that even with reduced Dem turnout, she still won by two million more votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2020, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,868 posts, read 12,910,007 times
Reputation: 19413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Regardless of the silly "wheels" metaphor - let's not forget that even with reduced Dem turnout, she still won by two million more votes.
Which meant ZERO!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 06:54 PM
 
Location: USA
31,077 posts, read 22,134,821 times
Reputation: 19104
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
Which meant ZERO!
Apparently Hillary didn't know about the Electoral college. She better ask for a refund for her Law degree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 09:52 PM
 
8,896 posts, read 5,385,644 times
Reputation: 5704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Regardless of the silly "wheels" metaphor - let's not forget that even with reduced Dem turnout, she still won by two million more votes.
Nope. The winner of the 2016 race is living in the White House. Besides, if she was such a winner why was there reduced Democratic turnout?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2020, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,220 posts, read 22,414,183 times
Reputation: 23860
Meh. All this is just chewing 4 year old cabbage. 2020 is a different year and a different election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 10:47 AM
 
34,087 posts, read 17,145,875 times
Reputation: 17235
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
Apparently Hillary didn't know about the Electoral college. She better ask for a refund for her Law degree
Likely forgot it after drinking all that Chardonnay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,429,270 times
Reputation: 8966
Hillary lost bros. The fact you Trumpists keep coming back to her says to me you are not feeling good about 2020 and reliving past glory is all that’s left for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2023, 08:42 PM
 
34,087 posts, read 17,145,875 times
Reputation: 17235
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Rasmussen is a lonely outlier right now, just as it was in 2012.

This is the one I got the percentages from. This forecast is in the middle, between the extremes. You can read the methodology they used to reach their forecast here:
How We

...and it's shifted a 10th of a point since I posted.

2016 President Forecast

if you want to see some more, here ya go:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=presid...APMCS1&PC=APMC

Bing puts Clinton at 88%.
538 puts Clinton at 85%
270 To Win has a stack of forecasts, too many to quote here, but all indicate a Clinton win.

Your choice- you can go with the fantasies in your head or the findings of statisticians who do this for their living, using a lot of education, experience, data, and math to reach their findings.

Choose wisely.
I did choose wisely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2023, 03:11 AM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,585,108 times
Reputation: 14952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Regardless of the silly "wheels" metaphor - let's not forget that even with reduced Dem turnout, she still won by two million more votes.
She got two million more votes, but she didn't win by two million votes because she didn't win at all.

That's not how we decide elections, but then you knew that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2023, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,176 posts, read 19,259,008 times
Reputation: 14922
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
She got two million more votes, but she didn't win by two million votes because she didn't win at all.

That's not how we decide elections, but then you knew that.
Clarallel hasn’t been a member here in over two years. I wouldn’t wait on a reply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top