Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not credible? Can you provide sources that Wikileaks has produced false material? Also were you this emraged with them when they were leaking stuff on Republicans? I bet not.
Notice the blue colored graph, wiki realated searches, waaaay outpacing all searches on trump and such other matters.
It's called verification. But nice try on the deflection. Your welcome.
You are correct. And what is also interesting is how after a few days the number of results for Trumps big scandal, tapered off. But wikileaks searches have stayed high. And these leaks are supposed to be coming out non stop for the rest of the election, so always a reason to keep reading them.
You are correct. And what is also interesting is how after a few days the number of results for Trumps big scandal, tapered off. But wikileaks searches have stayed high. And these leaks are supposed to be coming out non stop for the rest of the election, so always a reason to keep reading them.
Good point.
I also think that many hil supporters are clueless that many Americans don't trust mainstream news/buy the spoon feeding nonsense being shoveled out and the obvious favoritism in many big media quarters. It's obvious many think it's an obvious smear right before the election with all these woman coming out against trump at this convenient time and most see it as a card hand way overplayed. Most are more interested in the sleaze, true reality, not just accusations with no proof, that wiki leaks uncovered and how many of these clowns running our country operate. It's ugly. And lots of americans are finally waking up to it. Except hil supporters who defend all of this nonsense in a pathetic/denial fantasy land manner.
It shows specifically that what's negative to trump, his woman allegations vs what's negative to hil, wikileaks, there's far more interest in the negatives against hil/the dems. That's the takeaway in an apples to apples way. Trump is a media hog so I'm guessing searches on him are always pretty high and have been for at least a good year now.
As for scottsdale, it's a very nice city as is for the most part the Phoenix valley. This is snowbird central where many people in the cold parts of the west/midwest/other parts of the nation descend to our parts for our beautiful weather for 8 months for vacation or snow birding starting about now and all throughout the winter/spring. And scottsdale has many high end resorts, golf, etc. where people visit with many events going on all around the valley. So I'm guessing that's why many people are searching on it.
Look at the interest by city -- Scottsdale is the #1 city. Why?
I didn't know that. But I think that's a good thing for Trump. When you search Donald Trump, it takes you to his website and twitter. So it looks like he is twice as likely to get traffic to his website through google search. That's pretty amazing.
I'm not getting what you are saying. Who is forcing anyone to watch CNN (a legal enterprise)?
Wikileaks is an illegal entrprise.
If you are ok with people stealing your email and private info and publishing it, then just voluntarily send them to Assange.
I'm not ok with criminals, overseen by an ex-KBG dictator thug, stealing mine or anyone's private information and/or emails, then passing them on to a fugitive criminal to publish worldwide.
"im not ok with crimimals"
Good to know.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.